» Articles » PMID: 29513704

Route Optimization As an Instrument to Improve Animal Welfare and Economics in Pre-slaughter Logistics

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Mar 8
PMID 29513704
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Each year, more than three million animals are transported from farms to abattoirs in Sweden. Animal transport is related to economic and environmental costs and a negative impact on animal welfare. Time and the number of pick-up stops between farms and abattoirs are two key parameters for animal welfare. Both are highly dependent on efficient and qualitative transportation planning, which may be difficult if done manually. We have examined the benefits of using route optimization in cattle transportation planning. To simulate the effects of various planning time windows and transportation time regulations and number of pick-up stops along each route, we have used data that represent one year of cattle transport. Our optimization model is a development of a model used in forestry transport that solves a general pick-up and delivery vehicle routing problem. The objective is to minimize transportation costs. We have shown that the length of the planning time window has a significant impact on the animal transport time, the total driving time and the total distance driven; these parameters that will not only affect animal welfare but also affect the economy and environment in the pre-slaughter logistic chain. In addition, we have shown that changes in animal transportation regulations, such as minimizing the number of allowed pick-up stops on each route or minimizing animal transportation time, will have positive effects on animal welfare measured in transportation hours and number of pick-up stops. However, this leads to an increase in working time and driven distances, leading to higher transportation costs for the transport and negative environmental impact.

Citing Articles

Poultry Preslaughter Operations in Hot Environments: The Present Knowledge and the Next Steps Forward.

Vieira F, Portugal M, de Borba L, Angrecka S, Herbut P, Jongbo A Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(19).

PMID: 39409814 PMC: 11476210. DOI: 10.3390/ani14192865.


Animal transport as regulated in Europe: a work in progress as viewed by an NGO.

Bachelard N Anim Front. 2022; 12(1):16-24.

PMID: 35311188 PMC: 8929986. DOI: 10.1093/af/vfac010.


Logistics Distribution Route Optimization Model Based on Recursive Fuzzy Neural Network Algorithm.

Liu B Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021; 2021:3338840.

PMID: 34777491 PMC: 8589477. DOI: 10.1155/2021/3338840.

References
1.
Ruiz-de-la-Torre J, Velarde A, Diestre A, Gispert M, Hall S, Broom D . Effects of vehicle movements during transport on the stress responses and meat quality of sheep. Vet Rec. 2001; 148(8):227-9. DOI: 10.1136/vr.148.8.227. View

2.
Miranda-de la Lama G, Sepulveda W, Villarroel M, Maria G . Livestock vehicle accidents in Spain: causes, consequences, and effects on animal welfare. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2011; 14(2):109-23. DOI: 10.1080/10888705.2011.551622. View

3.
Hartung J . Effects of transport on health of farm animals. Vet Res Commun. 2003; 27 Suppl 1:525-7. DOI: 10.1023/b:verc.0000014212.81294.78. View

4.
Perez M, Palacio J, Santolaria M, Acena M, Chacon G, Gascon M . Effect of transport time on welfare and meat quality in pigs. Meat Sci. 2011; 61(4):425-33. DOI: 10.1016/s0309-1740(01)00216-9. View

5.
Broom D . Causes of poor welfare in large animals during transport. Vet Res Commun. 2003; 27 Suppl 1:515-8. DOI: 10.1023/b:verc.0000014210.29852.9a. View