» Articles » PMID: 29513701

Survival in Southern European Patients Waitlisted for Kidney Transplant After Graft Failure: A Competing Risk Analysis

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Mar 8
PMID 29513701
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Whether patients waitlisted for a second transplant after failure of a previous kidney graft have higher mortality than transplant-näive waitlisted patients is uncertain.

Methods: We assessed the relationship between a failed transplant and mortality in 3851 adult KT candidates, listed between 1984-2012, using a competing risk analysis in the total population and in a propensity score-matched cohort. Mortality was also modeled by inverse probability weighting (IPTW) competing risk regression.

Results: At waitlist entry 225 (5.8%) patients had experienced transplant failure. All-cause mortality was higher in the post-graft failure group (16% vs. 11%; P = 0.033). Most deaths occurred within three years after listing. Cardiovascular disease was the leading cause of death (25.3%), followed by infections (19.3%). Multivariate competing risk regression showed that prior transplant failure was associated with a 1.5-fold increased risk of mortality (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-2.2). After propensity score matching (1:5), the competing risk regression model revealed a subhazard ratio (SHR) of 1.6 (95% CI, 1.01-2.5). A similar mortality risk was observed after the IPTW analysis (SHR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.6).

Conclusions: Previous transplant failure is associated with increased mortality among KT candidates after relisting. This information is important in daily clinical practice when assessing relisted patients for a retransplant.

Citing Articles

Evaluating tuberculosis treatment outcomes in Haiti from 2018 to 2019: A competing risk analysis.

Raphael N, Garraud P, Roelens M, Alfred J, Richard M, Estill J IJID Reg. 2024; 11:100350.

PMID: 38577553 PMC: 10993134. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.03.005.


Rationale for Surrogate Endpoints and Conditional Marketing Authorization of New Therapies for Kidney Transplantation.

Naesens M, Loupy A, Hilbrands L, Oberbauer R, Bellini M, Glotz D Transpl Int. 2022; 35:10137.

PMID: 35669977 PMC: 9163307. DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10137.


Management of chronic renal allograft dysfunction and when to re-transplant.

Baker R, Marks S Pediatr Nephrol. 2018; 34(4):599-603.

PMID: 30039433 PMC: 6394652. DOI: 10.1007/s00467-018-4000-9.

References
1.
Mourad G, Minguet J, Pernin V, Garrigue V, Peraldi M, Kessler M . Similar patient survival following kidney allograft failure compared with non-transplanted patients. Kidney Int. 2014; 86(1):191-8. DOI: 10.1038/ki.2014.6. View

2.
DAgostino Jr R . Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998; 17(19):2265-81. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::aid-sim918>3.0.co;2-b. View

3.
Austin P, Grootendorst P, Anderson G . A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study. Stat Med. 2006; 26(4):734-53. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2580. View

4.
Sleiman J, Garrigue V, Vetromile F, Mourad G . Return to dialysis after renal allograft loss: is dialysis treatment initiated too late?. Transplant Proc. 2007; 39(8):2597-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.08.030. View

5.
Zimmermann J, Herrlinger S, Pruy A, Metzger T, Wanner C . Inflammation enhances cardiovascular risk and mortality in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 1999; 55(2):648-58. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00273.x. View