» Articles » PMID: 29509568

Outcomes in Patients with Vasodilatory Shock and Renal Replacement Therapy Treated with Intravenous Angiotensin II

Abstract

Objective: Acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy in severe vasodilatory shock is associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Angiotensin II treatment may help these patients by potentially restoring renal function without decreasing intrarenal oxygenation. We analyzed the impact of angiotensin II on the outcomes of acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy.

Design: Post hoc analysis of the Angiotensin II for the Treatment of High-Output Shock 3 trial.

Setting: ICUs.

Patients: Patients with acute kidney injury treated with renal replacement therapy at initiation of angiotensin II or placebo (n = 45 and n = 60, respectively).

Interventions: IV angiotensin II or placebo.

Measurements And Main Results: Primary end point: survival through day 28; secondary outcomes included renal recovery through day 7 and increase in mean arterial pressure from baseline of ≥ 10 mm Hg or increase to ≥ 75 mm Hg at hour 3. Survival rates through day 28 were 53% (95% CI, 38%-67%) and 30% (95% CI, 19%-41%) in patients treated with angiotensin II and placebo (p = 0.012), respectively. By day 7, 38% (95% CI, 25%-54%) of angiotensin II patients discontinued RRT versus 15% (95% CI, 8%-27%) placebo (p = 0.007). Mean arterial pressure response was achieved in 53% (95% CI, 38%-68%) and 22% (95% CI, 12%-34%) of patients treated with angiotensin II and placebo (p = 0.001), respectively.

Conclusions: In patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy at study drug initiation, 28-day survival and mean arterial pressure response were higher, and rate of renal replacement therapy liberation was greater in the angiotensin II group versus the placebo group. These findings suggest that patients with vasodilatory shock and acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy may preferentially benefit from angiotensin II.

Citing Articles

An index of the initial blood pressure response to angiotensin II treatment and its association with clinical outcomes in vasodilatory shock.

Leisman D, Wieruszewski P, Busse L, Chawla L, Hibbert K, Handisides D Crit Care. 2025; 29(1):81.

PMID: 39972379 PMC: 11837372. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-025-05311-z.


Management of vasoplegic shock.

Mistry R, Winearls J BJA Educ. 2025; 25(2):65-73.

PMID: 39897429 PMC: 11785552. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjae.2024.10.004.


New drugs for acute kidney injury.

Hariri G, Legrand M J Intensive Med. 2025; 5(1):3-11.

PMID: 39872831 PMC: 11763585. DOI: 10.1016/j.jointm.2024.08.001.


Haemodynamic management of septic shock.

Kotani Y, Ryan N, Udy A, Fujii T Burns Trauma. 2025; 13():tkae081.

PMID: 39816212 PMC: 11735046. DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkae081.


Non-adrenergic vasopressors for vasodilatory shock or perioperative vasoplegia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Kotani Y, Belletti A, DAmico F, Bonaccorso A, Wieruszewski P, Fujii T Crit Care. 2024; 28(1):439.

PMID: 39736782 PMC: 11686893. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05212-7.


References
1.
Chen H, Busse L . Novel Therapies for Acute Kidney Injury. Kidney Int Rep. 2017; 2(5):785-799. PMC: 5733745. DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2017.06.020. View

2.
Chawla L, Busse L, Brasha-Mitchell E, Alotaibi Z . The use of angiotensin II in distributive shock. Crit Care. 2016; 20(1):137. PMC: 4882778. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-016-1306-5. View

3.
Langenberg C, Bagshaw S, May C, Bellomo R . The histopathology of septic acute kidney injury: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2008; 12(2):R38. PMC: 2447560. DOI: 10.1186/cc6823. View

4.
Suberviola B, Rodrigo E, Gonzalez-Castro A, Serrano M, Heras M, Castellanos-Ortega A . Association between exposure to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers prior to septic shock and acute kidney injury. Med Intensiva. 2017; 41(1):21-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.medin.2016.07.010. View

5.
De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, Madl C, Chochrad D, Aldecoa C . Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(9):779-89. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907118. View