» Articles » PMID: 29506563

Evaluation of Community-level Interventions to Increase Early Initiation of Antenatal Care in Pregnancy: Protocol for the Community REACH Study, a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial with Integrated Process and Economic Evaluations

Abstract

Background: The provision of high-quality maternity services is a priority for reducing inequalities in health outcomes for mothers and infants. Best practice includes women having their initial antenatal appointment within the first trimester of pregnancy in order to provide screening and support for healthy lifestyles, well-being and self-care in pregnancy. Previous research has identified inequalities in access to antenatal care, yet there is little evidence on interventions to improve early initiation of antenatal care. The Community REACH trial will assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of engaging communities in the co-production and delivery of an intervention that addresses this issue.

Methods/design: The study design is a matched cluster randomised controlled trial with integrated process and economic evaluations. The unit of randomisation is electoral ward. The intervention will be delivered in 10 wards; 10 comparator wards will have normal practice. The primary outcome is the proportion of pregnant women attending their antenatal booking appointment by the 12th completed week of pregnancy. This and a number of secondary outcomes will be assessed for cohorts of women (n = approximately 1450 per arm) who give birth 2-7 and 8-13 months after intervention delivery completion in the included wards, using routinely collected maternity data. Eight hospitals commissioned to provide maternity services in six NHS trusts in north and east London and Essex have been recruited to the study. These trusts will provide anonymised routine data for randomisation and outcomes analysis. The process evaluation will examine intervention implementation, acceptability, reach and possible causal pathways. The economic evaluation will use a cost-consequences analysis and decision model to evaluate the intervention. Targeted community engagement in the research process was a priority.

Discussion: Community REACH aims to increase early initiation of antenatal care using an intervention that is co-produced and delivered by local communities. This pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial, with integrated process and economic evaluation, aims to rigorously assess the effectiveness of this public health intervention, which is particularly complex due to the required combination of standardisation with local flexibility. It will also answer questions about scalability and generalisability.

Trial Registration: ISRCTN registry: registration number 63066975 . Registered on 18 August 2015.

Citing Articles

Facilitators and barriers to seeking and engaging with antenatal care in high-income countries: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research.

Escanuela Sanchez T, Linehan L, ODonoghue K, Byrne M, Meaney S Health Soc Care Community. 2022; 30(6):e3810-e3828.

PMID: 36240064 PMC: 10092326. DOI: 10.1111/hsc.14072.


Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.

Lowe D, Ryan R, Schonfeld L, Merner B, Walsh L, Graham-Wisener L Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 9:CD013373.

PMID: 34523117 PMC: 8440158. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.


Using electronic patient records to assess the effect of a complex antenatal intervention in a cluster randomised controlled trial-data management experience from the DESiGN Trial team.

Relph S, Elstad M, Coker B, Vieira M, Moitt N, Gutierrez W Trials. 2021; 22(1):195.

PMID: 33685512 PMC: 7941939. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05141-8.


Group antenatal care (Pregnancy Circles) for diverse and disadvantaged women: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluations.

Wiggins M, Sawtell M, Wiseman O, McCourt C, Eldridge S, Hunter R BMC Health Serv Res. 2020; 20(1):919.

PMID: 33028319 PMC: 7541287. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05751-z.


Adjust your own oxygen mask before helping those around you: an autoethnography of participatory research.

Steketee A, Archibald T, Harden S Implement Sci. 2020; 15(1):70.

PMID: 32883350 PMC: 7469339. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-01002-1.

References
1.
Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T . Complex interventions: how "out of control" can a randomised controlled trial be?. BMJ. 2004; 328(7455):1561-3. PMC: 437159. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.328.7455.1561. View

2.
Chan A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D, Laupacis A, Gotzsche P, Krleza-Jeric K . SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013; 158(3):200-7. PMC: 5114123. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583. View

3.
Downe S, Finlayson K, Walsh D, Lavender T . 'Weighing up and balancing out': a meta-synthesis of barriers to antenatal care for marginalised women in high-income countries. BJOG. 2009; 116(4):518-29. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02067.x. View

4.
Brunton G, OMara-Eves A, Thomas J . The 'active ingredients' for successful community engagement with disadvantaged expectant and new mothers: a qualitative comparative analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2014; 70(12):2847-60. DOI: 10.1111/jan.12441. View

5.
Cresswell J, Yu G, Hatherall B, Morris J, Jamal F, Harden A . Predictors of the timing of initiation of antenatal care in an ethnically diverse urban cohort in the UK. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013; 13:103. PMC: 3652742. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-103. View