» Articles » PMID: 29505985

Population-level Predictions from Cannabis Risk Perceptions to Active Cannabis Use Prevalence in the United States, 1991-2014

Overview
Journal Addict Behav
Date 2018 Mar 6
PMID 29505985
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: A mosaic of evidence links risk perceptions with drug use in adolescence, including population summaries to guide public health campaigns, as well as subject-specific estimates on preventing an adolescent's drug use by manipulating that individual's prior risk perceptions. We re-visit these issues with a public health perspective, asking whether population-level cannabis risk perceptions of school-attending adolescents at one grade level might predict cannabis use prevalence two and four grade levels later.

Methods: From 1991 to 2014, each year's United States "Monitoring the Future" (MTF) study population included 8th-, 10th-, & 12th-graders. Two and four years later, statistically independent school samples of the same cohorts were drawn and assessed (n ~ 16,000/year). Population-level modeling estimated cannabis use prevalence at time "t" (12th-grade) regressed on that same cohort's cannabis risk perceptions as had been measured at time "t-4" (8th-grade) and time "t-2" (10th-grade).

Results: Higher cannabis risk perception levels for 10th-graders predict lower cannabis use prevalence when 10th-graders have become 12th-graders (β̂=-0.12), and higher cannabis risk perception levels of 8th-graders predict lower cannabis prevalence when 8th-graders have become 10th-graders (β̂=-0.27); p-values < 0.05. Across four-year spans, the prediction is null (p-value = 0.619).

Conclusions: This within-cohort across-grade population-level prediction prompts questions for drug prevention specialists, including "Would a relatively small upward shift in a local area population's appraisal of risk perceptions be followed, two years later, by reduced population prevalence of cannabis use?" Future randomized trial designs, health education, or prevention efforts focused on altering early adolescent cannabis risk perceptions might provide the most convincing and definitive evidence.

Citing Articles

Associations between Cannabis Consumption Methods and Cannabis Risk Perception.

Choi N, Marti C, Choi B Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(8).

PMID: 39200597 PMC: 11353858. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21080986.


Cannabis and opioid perceptions, co-use, and substitution among patients across 4 NCI-Designated Cancer Centers.

Ashare R, Worster B, Nugent S, Smith D, Morasco B, Leader A J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2024; 2024(66):267-274.

PMID: 39108237 PMC: 11303867. DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad027.


Direct and Indirect Effects of Cannabis Risk Perceptions on Cannabis Use Frequency.

Florimbio A, Walton M, Duval E, Bauermeister J, Young S, McAfee J Addict Res Theory. 2024; 32(1):68-73.

PMID: 38268741 PMC: 10805454. DOI: 10.1080/16066359.2023.2221029.


E-cigarette and combustible cigarette cessation patterns, reasons, and methods among adolescents, young adults, and adults.

Lin C, Mathur Gaiha S, Halpern-Felsher B Addict Behav. 2023; 150:107918.

PMID: 38070362 PMC: 10845159. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107918.


Abrupt peaks in perceived risk of occasional drug use after changing the question order in a repeated self-administered survey.

Perez-Romero C, Barrio G, Hoyos J, Belza M, Regidor E, Donat M Front Public Health. 2023; 11:971239.

PMID: 37124773 PMC: 10140628. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.971239.


References
1.
Stacy A, Bentler P, Flay B . Attitudes and health behavior in diverse populations: drunk driving. Alcohol use, binge eating, marijuana use, and cigarette use. Health Psychol. 1994; 13(1):73-85. DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.13.1.73. View

2.
Malmberg M, Overbeek G, Vermulst A, Monshouwer K, Vollebergh W, Engels R . The theory of planned behavior: precursors of marijuana use in early adolescence?. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011; 123(1-3):22-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.10.011. View

3.
Schmidt L, Jacobs L, Spetz J . Young People's More Permissive Views About Marijuana: Local Impact of State Laws or National Trend?. Am J Public Health. 2016; 106(8):1498-503. PMC: 4940634. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303153. View

4.
Hall W, Weier M . Assessing the public health impacts of legalizing recreational cannabis use in the USA. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015; 97(6):607-15. DOI: 10.1002/cpt.110. View

5.
Keyes K, Wall M, Cerda M, Schulenberg J, OMalley P, Galea S . How does state marijuana policy affect US youth? Medical marijuana laws, marijuana use and perceived harmfulness: 1991-2014. Addiction. 2016; 111(12):2187-2195. PMC: 5222836. DOI: 10.1111/add.13523. View