» Articles » PMID: 29503735

The Evolving Collaborative Relationship Between Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs) and Clinical and Translational Science Awardees (CTSAs)

Overview
Date 2018 Mar 6
PMID 29503735
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs) and Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs) have complementary missions. We replicated a 2008 survey of CTSA-PBRN leaders to understand how organizational relationships have evolved.

Methods: We surveyed 60 CTSA community engagement (CE) Directors and 135 PBRN Directors and analyzed data using between and within-group comparisons.

Results: Forty-three percent of CTSA CE Directors (26/60) and forty-two percent of PBRN Directors (57/135) responded. Quantitative responses revealed growing alignment between CTSA/PBRN perceptions, with a few areas of discordance. CE Directors noted declining financial support for PBRNs. PBRN Directors identified greater CTSA effectiveness in PBRN engagement, consultation, and collaborative grant submissions. Qualitative data revealed divergent experiences across CTSA/PBRN programs.

Conclusions: Relationships between CTSAs and PBRNs are maturing; for some that means strengthening and for others a growing vulnerability. Findings suggest a mutual opportunity for PBRNs and CTSAs around applied research. Studies to characterize exemplar CTSA-PBRN collaborations are needed.

Citing Articles

The Role of Primary Care in Improving Population Health.

Stange K, Miller W, Etz R Milbank Q. 2023; 101(S1):795-840.

PMID: 37096603 PMC: 10126984. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12638.


Structure, function, and productivity from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Gilbert G, Fellows J, Allareddy V, Cochran D, Cunha-Cruz J, Gordan V J Clin Transl Sci. 2022; 6(1):e87.

PMID: 35989860 PMC: 9379935. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2022.421.


Improving colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care: Preliminary effectiveness and implementation of a collaborative mailed fecal immunochemical test pilot.

Davis M, Coury J, Larson J, Gunn R, Towey E, Ketelhut A J Rural Health. 2022; 39(1):279-290.

PMID: 35703582 PMC: 9969840. DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12685.


Academic-industry partnership advancing cannabis science: A Complementary Care Practice-Based Research Network.

Ennis N, Vance C, Bradbury R Complement Ther Med. 2022; 66:102821.

PMID: 35247600 PMC: 10680467. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2022.102821.


Integration of Improvement and Implementation Science in Practice-Based Research Networks: a Longitudinal, Comparative Case Study.

Davis M, Gunn R, Kenzie E, Dickinson C, Conway C, Chau A J Gen Intern Med. 2021; 36(6):1503-1513.

PMID: 33852140 PMC: 8175491. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06610-1.


References
1.
Bakken S, Lantigua R, Busacca L, Thomas Bigger J . Barriers, enablers, and incentives for research participation: a report from the Ambulatory Care Research Network (ACRN). J Am Board Fam Med. 2009; 22(4):436-45. PMC: 2744643. DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.04.090017. View

2.
Zerhouni E . Medicine. The NIH Roadmap. Science. 2003; 302(5642):63-72. DOI: 10.1126/science.1091867. View

3.
Calmbach W, Ryan J, Baldwin L, Knox L . Practice-based research networks (PBRNs): meeting the challenges of the future. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012; 25(5):572-6. PMC: 3880656. DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.05.120064. View

4.
Fagnan L, Davis M, Deyo R, Werner J, Stange K . Linking practice-based research networks and Clinical and Translational Science Awards: new opportunities for community engagement by academic health centers. Acad Med. 2010; 85(3):476-83. PMC: 4059036. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181cd2ed3. View

5.
Williams R, Rhyne R . No longer simply a Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) health improvement networks. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011; 24(5):485-8. DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.05.110102. View