» Articles » PMID: 29503571

Prognostic Significance of Mucinous Component in Gastric Adenocarcinoma After Radical D2 Gastrectomy

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Mar 6
PMID 29503571
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The mucinous component is a special histologic factor in gastric adenocarcinoma. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of mucinous component in gastric adenocarcinoma according to proportion.

Patients And Methods: Candidate patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were given radical D2 gastrectomies from September 2008 to May 2015 in our division. Clinicopathologic data and prognosis were monitored and analyzed among gastric adenocarcinoma patients with various proportions of mucinous component.

Results: A total of 690 gastric adenocarcinomas with various proportions of mucinous component from 6,025 gastric adenocarcinoma patients were included. Higher numbers of patients with mucinous component came from: young patients, females, those with drinking history, at lower locations, Borrmann type III and IV, T4 stage, and positive for dissected lymph nodes. Tumors and pathological molecular markers showed more positivity in CEA, CA19-9, S100, and CD34. As the various proportions increased, more mucinous component seemed to be accompanied by more Borrmann type III and IV, T4 stage, and more positive expression of CEA and CA19-9. However, no significant difference in 5-year overall survival rate was observed among various proportions or existence of mucinous component. Also, proportion or existence of mucinous component was not an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion: Mucinous component was not a prognostic factor for gastric adenocarcinoma after radical D2 gastrectomy, no matter what proportion the component comprised. However, gastric adenocarcinoma with mucinous component showed specific clinicopathological characteristics, such as more advanced tumor stage, different age and sex, and more positive rate of molecular markers, which might provide a new strategy for optimal individual diagnosis and therapies.

Citing Articles

Histopathological response to chemotherapy and survival of mucinous type gastric cancer.

Caspers I, Slagter A, Vissers P, Lopez-Yurda M, Beerepoot L, Ruurda J J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024; 117(2):253-261.

PMID: 39276158 PMC: 11807439. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae227.


Adenocarcinoma with Mixed Subtypes in the Early and Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Zhao X, Li Y, Yang Z, Zhang H, Wang H, Lin J Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021; 2021:8497305.

PMID: 34746042 PMC: 8570884. DOI: 10.1155/2021/8497305.


Development and validation of a CT-based radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of tumor histologic grade in gastric adenocarcinoma.

Huang J, Yao H, Li Y, Dong M, Han C, He L Chin J Cancer Res. 2021; 33(1):69-78.

PMID: 33707930 PMC: 7941693. DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.01.08.

References
1.
Zhang M, Zhu G, Zhang H, Gao H, Han X, Xue Y . Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of mucinous gastric carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2010; 102(1):64-7. DOI: 10.1002/jso.21533. View

2.
Kunisaki C, Akiyama H, Nomura M, Matsuda G, Otsuka Y, Ono H . Clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcomes of mucinous gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006; 13(6):836-42. DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2006.03.077. View

3.
Zu H, Wang H, Li C, Xue Y . Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic value of various histological types in advanced gastric cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014; 7(9):5692-700. PMC: 4203181. View

4.
Jiang H, Zhang H, Tian L, Zhang X, Xue Y . The difference in clinic-pathological features between signet ring cell carcinoma and gastric mucinous adenocarcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2013; 34(5):2625-31. DOI: 10.1007/s13277-013-0812-1. View

5.
Jian-Hui C, Shi-Rong C, Hui W, Jian-Bo X, Kai-Ming W, Si-le C . Gastric Mucinous Cancer Histology: Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognostic Value. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016; 2016:8947505. PMC: 4709619. DOI: 10.1155/2016/8947505. View