» Articles » PMID: 29501792

Neural Basis of the Crossmodal Correspondence Between Auditory Pitch and Visuospatial Elevation

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Psychology
Date 2018 Mar 5
PMID 29501792
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Crossmodal correspondences refer to associations between otherwise unrelated stimulus features in different sensory modalities. For example, high and low auditory pitches are associated with high and low visuospatial elevation, respectively. The neural mechanisms underlying crossmodal correspondences are currently unknown. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the neural basis of the pitch-elevation correspondence. Pitch-elevation congruency effects were observed bilaterally in the inferior frontal and insular cortex, the right frontal eye field and right inferior parietal cortex. Independent functional localizers failed to provide strong evidence for any of three proposed mechanisms for crossmodal correspondences: semantic mediation, magnitude estimation, and multisensory integration. Instead, pitch-elevation congruency effects overlapped with areas selective for visually presented non-word strings relative to sentences, and with regions sensitive to audiovisual asynchrony. Taken together with the prior literature, the observed congruency effects are most consistent with mediation by multisensory attention.

Citing Articles

Cross-modal congruency modulates evidence accumulation, not decision thresholds.

Brozova N, Vollmer L, Kampa B, Kayser C, Fels J Front Neurosci. 2025; 19:1513083.

PMID: 40052091 PMC: 11882578. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1513083.


Assessing the limits on size-pitch mapping reveals the interplay between top-down and bottom-up influences on relative crossmodal correspondences.

Indraccolo A, Del Gatto C, Pedale T, Santangelo V, Spence C, Brunetti R Psychol Res. 2025; 89(2):53.

PMID: 39960509 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-025-02082-8.


A meta-analysis of letter-sound integration: Assimilation and accommodation in the superior temporal gyrus.

Gao D, Liang X, Ting Q, Nichols E, Bai Z, Xu C Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(15):e26713.

PMID: 39447213 PMC: 11501095. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26713.


Crossmodal Correspondence Mediates Crossmodal Transfer from Visual to Auditory Stimuli in Category Learning.

Sun Y, Yao L, Fu Q J Intell. 2024; 12(9).

PMID: 39330459 PMC: 11433196. DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence12090080.


Involvement of the superior colliculi in crossmodal correspondences.

McEwan J, Kritikos A, Zeljko M Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024; 86(3):931-941.

PMID: 38418807 PMC: 11062976. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02866-x.


References
1.
Parise C, Knorre K, Ernst M . Natural auditory scene statistics shapes human spatial hearing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(16):6104-8. PMC: 4000839. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1322705111. View

2.
Shor R . An auditory analog of the Stroop Test. J Gen Psychol. 1975; 93(2d Half):281-8. View

3.
Poldrack R . Inferring mental states from neuroimaging data: from reverse inference to large-scale decoding. Neuron. 2011; 72(5):692-7. PMC: 3240863. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.001. View

4.
Eitan Z, Timmers R . Beethoven's last piano sonata and those who follow crocodiles: cross-domain mappings of auditory pitch in a musical context. Cognition. 2009; 114(3):405-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.013. View

5.
Bhat J, Miller L, Pitt M, Shahin A . Putative mechanisms mediating tolerance for audiovisual stimulus onset asynchrony. J Neurophysiol. 2014; 113(5):1437-50. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00200.2014. View