» Articles » PMID: 29501544

The Impact of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction on Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2018 Mar 5
PMID 29501544
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to determine the impact of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Background: Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy in response to afterload increase promotes the development of LVDD and represents an early stage in the progression to valvular heart failure.

Methods: In a consecutive cohort of 777 aortic stenosis patients undergoing TAVR, LVDD was categorized according to the latest guidelines. The primary endpoint was 1-year all-cause mortality.

Results: There were 545 (70.1%) patients with LVDD. Ninety-eight (18.0%), 198 (36.3%), and 104 (19.1%) patients were classified as LVDD grades I, II, and III, respectively. In 145 (26.6%) patients, LVDD grade could not be determined because of only 1 or 2 discrepant variables. One-year all-cause mortality was higher in patients with LVDD grades I (16.3%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.32; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15 to 4.66), II (17.9%; HR: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.43 to 4.67), and III (27.6%; HR: 4.21; 95% CI: 2.25 to 7.86) than in those with normal diastolic function (6.9%). The difference in clinical outcome emerged within 30 days, was driven by cardiovascular death, and maintained in a sensitivity analysis of patients with normal systolic LV function. Furthermore, LVDD grades I (HR: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.17 to 4.74), II (HR: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.42 to 4.66), and III (HR: 4.41; 95% CI: 2.37 to 8.20) were independent predictors of 1-year mortality.

Conclusions: Advancing stages of LVDD are associated with an incremental risk of all-cause mortality after TAVR, driven by cardiovascular death and taking effect as early as 30 days after the intervention.

Citing Articles

Prognostic implications and alterations in left atrial deformation following transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Butcher S, Hirasawa K, Meucci M, Stassen J, Kuneman J, Pereira A Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024; 25(12):1638-1648.

PMID: 38984693 PMC: 11601807. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeae170.


Diastolic Dysfunction and Health Status Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

El-Zein R, Malik A, Cohen D, Spertus J, Saxon J, Pibarot P Struct Heart. 2024; 8(1):100225.

PMID: 38283566 PMC: 10818150. DOI: 10.1016/j.shj.2023.100225.


MR 4D flow-derived left atrial acceleration factor for differentiating advanced left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.

Reiter C, Reiter U, Krauter C, Kolesnik E, Scherr D, Schmidt A Eur Radiol. 2023; 34(6):4065-4076.

PMID: 37953367 PMC: 11166802. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10386-9.


Echocardiographic Evaluation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Comprehensive Review.

Angellotti D, Manzo R, Castiello D, Immobile Molaro M, Mariani A, Iapicca C Life (Basel). 2023; 13(5).

PMID: 37240724 PMC: 10221682. DOI: 10.3390/life13051079.


Is There Still a Role for Invasive Assessment of Aortic Gradient?.

Angellotti D, Immobile Molaro M, Simonetti F, Ilardi F, Castiello D, Mariani A Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(10).

PMID: 37238182 PMC: 10217169. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13101698.