How the Start into the Clinical Elective Year Could Be Improved: Qualitative Results and Recommendations from Student Interviews

Overview

Journal GMS J Med Educ

Specialties General Medicine
Medical Education

Date 2018 Mar 3

PMID 29497699

Citations 4

Authors

Samuel Beck

Christian Schirlo

Jan Breckwoldt

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Entering the Clinical Elective Year (CEY) is a challenging transition phase for undergraduate medical students. Students become members of a professional team, thereby taking over certain tasks, which are executed more or less independently. Factors which facilitate (or impede) this transition in the perception of students are not well described. We therefore wanted to explore, what students perceived to be helpful during the first phase of the CEY and possibly derive respective recommendations. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 5th year medical students after they had completed the first two months of their CEY. Students were asked which problems they had faced and how they felt prepared for the CEY. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed by qualitative content analysis. From 34 interviews, we included 28 into analysis. Overall, 24 students were satisfied or very satisfied with their start into the CEY. Satisfaction was expressed with respect to workplace experiences, learning progress, responsibilities and team integration. Especially, students appreciated if they were integrated as active members of the team, were given responsibility for certain units of work, and received well-structured formal teaching and supervision. Students had divergent opinions about the quality of teaching and supervision, about their own achievements, and the recognition they received. Students recommended improvements in respect to formal teaching and supervision by clinical supervisors, preparation of the CEY by university, and supporting structures in the hosting institution. Students in this study were generally satisfied with the first two months of their CEY. Facilitating factors were active and responsible involvement into routine patient care, and high quality formal teaching and supervision. Findings may inform universities, teaching hospitals, and students how to better shape the first phase of the CEY.

Citing Articles

[Innovative facultative seminar concepts regarding clinical teaching and preparing practice-oriented phases, such as medical clerkships and the final clinical internship from a surgical perspective].

Stieger P, Schildberg C, Gottschalk M, Werwick K, Hunger J, Walcher F Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2022; 94(5):432-440.

PMID: 36418573 PMC: 10156815. DOI: 10.1007/s00104-022-01757-x.

What reasons do final-year medical students give for choosing the hospitals for their clinical training phases? A quantitative content analysis.

Homberg A, Narciss E, Schuttpelz-Brauns K GMS J Med Educ. 2019; 36(4):Doc38.

PMID: 31544138 PMC: 6737269. DOI: 10.3205/zma001246.

Challenging cases during clinical clerkships beyond the domain of the "medical expert": an analysis of students' case vignettes.

Bachli P, Meindl-Fridez C, Weiss-Breckwoldt A, Breckwoldt J GMS J Med Educ. 2019; 36(3):Doc30.

PMID: 31211225 PMC: 6545608. DOI: 10.3205/zma001238.

Trusted to Learn: a Qualitative Study of Clerkship Students' Perspectives on Trust in the Clinical Learning Environment.

Karp N, Hauer K, Sheu L J Gen Intern Med. 2019; 34(5):662-668.

PMID: 30993622 PMC: 6502927. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-04883-1.

References

Dupuis M, Schirlo C . The clinical electives year in undergraduate medical training in Switzerland: an overview. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012; 106(2):85-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.12.006. View

Birkmeyer J, Siewers A, Finlayson E, Stukel T, Lucas F, Batista I . Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(15):1128-37. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa012337. View

Prince K, Boshuizen H, van der Vleuten C, Scherpbier A . Students' opinions about their preparation for clinical practice. Med Educ. 2005; 39(7):704-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02207.x. View

Westerman M, Teunissen P, van der Vleuten C, Scherpbier A, Siegert C, van der Lee N . Understanding the transition from resident to attending physician: a transdisciplinary, qualitative study. Acad Med. 2010; 85(12):1914-9. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181fa2913. View

Ericsson K . Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med. 2004; 79(10 Suppl):S70-81. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022. View

Hauer K, Ten Cate O, Boscardin C, Irby D, Iobst W, OSullivan P . Understanding trust as an essential element of trainee supervision and learning in the workplace. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013; 19(3):435-56. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-013-9474-4. View

Teunissen P, Westerman M . Opportunity or threat: the ambiguity of the consequences of transitions in medical education. Med Educ. 2010; 45(1):51-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03755.x. View

Han H, Roberts N, Korte R . Learning in the real place: medical students' learning and socialization in clerkships at one medical school. Acad Med. 2014; 90(2):231-9. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000544. View

Nikendei C, Krautter M, Celebi N, Obertacke U, Junger J . Final year medical education in Germany. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012; 106(2):75-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.01.002. View

10.

Dijksterhuis M, Schuwirth L, Braat D, Teunissen P, Scheele F . A qualitative study on trainees' and supervisors' perceptions of assessment for learning in postgraduate medical education. Med Teach. 2013; 35(8):e1396-402. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.756576. View

11.

Remmen R, Denekens J, Scherpbier A, Hermann I, van der Vleuten C, Royen P . An evaluation study of the didactic quality of clerkships. Med Educ. 2000; 34(6):460-4. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00570.x. View

12.

Kohl-Hackert N, Krautter M, Andreesen S, Hoffmann K, Herzog W, Junger J . Workplace learning: an analysis of students' expectations of learning on the ward in the Department of Internal Medicine. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2014; 31(4):Doc43. PMC: 4259062. DOI: 10.3205/zma000935. View

13.

Reddy S, Chao J, Carter J, Drucker R, Katz N, Nesbit R . Alliance for clinical education perspective paper: recommendations for redesigning the "final year" of medical school. Teach Learn Med. 2014; 26(4):420-7. DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2014.945027. View

14.

Steven K, Wenger E, Boshuizen H, Scherpbier A, Dornan T . How clerkship students learn from real patients in practice settings. Acad Med. 2014; 89(3):469-76. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000129. View

15.

Pereira A, Harrell H, Weissman A, Smith C, Dupras D, Kane G . Important Skills for Internship and the Fourth-Year Medical School Courses to Acquire Them: A National Survey of Internal Medicine Residents. Acad Med. 2016; 91(6):821-6. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001134. View

16.

Teunissen P, Stapel D, van der Vleuten C, Scherpbier A, Boor K, Scheele F . Who wants feedback? An investigation of the variables influencing residents' feedback-seeking behavior in relation to night shifts. Acad Med. 2009; 84(7):910-7. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181a858ad. View

17.

Bell K, Boshuizen H, Scherpbier A, Dornan T . When only the real thing will do: junior medical students' learning from real patients. Med Educ. 2009; 43(11):1036-43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03508.x. View

18.

Schrauth M, Weyrich P, Kraus B, Junger J, Zipfel S, Nikendei C . [Workplace learning for final-year medical students: a comprehensive analysis of student's expectancies and experiences]. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2009; 103(3):169-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2008.05.005. View

19.

Bok H, Jaarsma D, Spruijt A, van Beukelen P, van der Vleuten C, Teunissen P . Feedback-giving behaviour in performance evaluations during clinical clerkships. Med Teach. 2015; 38(1):88-95. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1017448. View

20.

Ten Cate O, Hart D, Ankel F, Busari J, Englander R, Glasgow N . Entrustment Decision Making in Clinical Training. Acad Med. 2015; 91(2):191-8. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001044. View