» Articles » PMID: 29497220

The Mirror to Our Soul? Comparisons of Spontaneous and Posed Vocal Expression of Emotion

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2018 Mar 3
PMID 29497220
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It has been the subject of much debate in the study of vocal expression of emotions whether posed expressions (e.g., actor portrayals) are different from spontaneous expressions. In the present investigation, we assembled a new database consisting of 1877 voice clips from 23 datasets, and used it to systematically compare spontaneous and posed expressions across 3 experiments. Results showed that (a) spontaneous expressions were generally rated as more genuinely emotional than were posed expressions, even when controlling for differences in emotion intensity, (b) there were differences between the two stimulus types with regard to their acoustic characteristics, and (c) spontaneous expressions with a high emotion intensity conveyed discrete emotions to listeners to a similar degree as has previously been found for posed expressions, supporting a dose-response relationship between intensity of expression and discreteness in perceived emotions. Our conclusion is that there are reliable differences between spontaneous and posed expressions, though not necessarily in the ways commonly assumed. Implications for emotion theories and the use of emotion portrayals in studies of vocal expression are discussed.

Citing Articles

Impact of social context on human facial and gestural emotion expressions.

Heesen R, Szenteczki M, Kim Y, Kret M, Atkinson A, Upton Z iScience. 2024; 27(11):110663.

PMID: 39555406 PMC: 11565554. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110663.


Can Perceivers Differentiate Intense Facial Expressions? Eye Movement Patterns.

Huang L, Zhu T, Cai J, Sun Y, Wang Y Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(3).

PMID: 38540488 PMC: 10968644. DOI: 10.3390/bs14030185.


Measuring engagement among older adults using a multidimensional approach to communication.

Radnan M, Li W, Stevens C, Hill C, Jones C Front Psychol. 2022; 13:981008.

PMID: 36483708 PMC: 9723878. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.981008.


Cultural differences in vocal expression analysis: Effects of task, language, and stimulus-related factors.

Zhang S, Pell M PLoS One. 2022; 17(10):e0275915.

PMID: 36215311 PMC: 9550067. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275915.


Comparing supervised and unsupervised approaches to multimodal emotion recognition.

Fernandez Carbonell M, Boman M, Laukka P PeerJ Comput Sci. 2022; 7:e804.

PMID: 35036530 PMC: 8725659. DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.804.


References
1.
Nordstrom H, Laukka P . The time course of emotion recognition in speech and music. J Acoust Soc Am. 2019; 145(5):3058. DOI: 10.1121/1.5108601. View

2.
Frank M, Stennett J . The forced-choice paradigm and the perception of facial expressions of emotion. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001; 80(1):75-85. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.80.1.75. View

3.
Juslin P, Laukka P . Communication of emotions in vocal expression and music performance: different channels, same code?. Psychol Bull. 2003; 129(5):770-814. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.770. View

4.
Greasley P, Sherrard C, Waterman M . Emotion in language and speech: methodological issues in naturalistic approaches. Lang Speech. 2001; 43(Pt 4):355-75. DOI: 10.1177/00238309000430040201. View

5.
Banziger T, Mortillaro M, Scherer K . Introducing the Geneva Multimodal expression corpus for experimental research on emotion perception. Emotion. 2011; 12(5):1161-79. DOI: 10.1037/a0025827. View