Bony Ingrowth Potential of 3D-printed Porous Titanium Alloy: a Direct Comparison of Interbody Cage Materials in an in Vivo Ovine Lumbar Fusion Model

Overview

Journal Spine J

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2018 Mar 3

PMID 29496624

Citations 82

Authors

Kirk C McGilvray

Jeremiah Easley

Howard B Seim

Daniel Regan

Sigurd H Berven

Wellington K Hsu

Thomas E Mroz

Christian M Puttlitz

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background Context: There is significant variability in the materials commonly used for interbody cages in spine surgery. It is theorized that three-dimensional (3D)-printed interbody cages using porous titanium material can provide more consistent bone ingrowth and biological fixation.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to provide an evidence-based approach to decision-making regarding interbody materials for spinal fusion.

Study Design: A comparative animal study was performed.

Methods: A skeletally mature ovine lumbar fusion model was used for this study. Interbody fusions were performed at L2-L3 and L4-L5 in 27 mature sheep using three different interbody cages (ie, polyetheretherketone [PEEK], plasma sprayed porous titanium-coated PEEK [PSP], and 3D-printed porous titanium alloy cage [PTA]). Non-destructive kinematic testing was performed in the three primary directions of motion. The specimens were then analyzed using micro-computed tomography (µ-CT); quantitative measures of the bony fusion were performed. Histomorphometric analyses were also performed in the sagittal plane through the interbody device. Outcome parameters were compared between cage designs and time points.

Results: Flexion-extension range of motion (ROM) was statistically reduced for the PTA group compared with the PEEK cages at 16 weeks (p-value=.02). Only the PTA cages demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in ROM and increase in stiffness across all three loading directions between the 8-week and 16-week sacrifice time points (p-value≤.01). Micro-CT data demonstrated significantly greater total bone volume within the graft window for the PTA cages at both 8 weeks and 16 weeks compared with the PEEK cages (p-value<.01).

Conclusions: A direct comparison of interbody implants demonstrates significant and measurable differences in biomechanical, µ-CT, and histologic performance in an ovine model. The 3D-printed porous titanium interbody cage resulted in statistically significant reductions in ROM, increases in the bone ingrowth profile, as well as average construct stiffness compared with PEEK and PSP.

Citing Articles

Clinical and radiological outcomes of titanium cage versus polyetheretherketone cage in lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wang H, Zhang H, Xiao C, Zhang K, Qi L Neurosurg Rev. 2025; 48(1):295.

PMID: 40075000 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-025-03453-w.

Biomechanical analysis of a newly designed and 3D printed plate-locking interbody cage: an observational study of finite element analysis.

Ni S, Yang R, Liu S, Hu Y Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3534.

PMID: 39875489 PMC: 11775238. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88151-9.

Artificial Intelligence-Guided Inverse Design of Deployable Thermo-Metamaterial Implants.

Jiao P, Zhang C, Meng W, Wang J, Jang D, Wu Z ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2025; 17(2):2991-3001.

PMID: 39746033 PMC: 11744508. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.4c17625.

Clinical Application of 3D-Printed Artificial Vertebral Body (3DP AVB): A Review.

Kiselev R, Zheravin A J Pers Med. 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 39452532 PMC: 11508315. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14101024.

A novel porous interbody fusion cage modified by microarc oxidation and hydrothermal treatment technology accelerate osseointegration and spinal fusion in sheep.

Sun J, Liu S, Zou D, Ni R, Wei C, Wang H RSC Adv. 2024; 14(44):31966-31978.

PMID: 39391624 PMC: 11462409. DOI: 10.1039/d3ra08185k.

References

De Leonardis D, Garg A, Pecora G . Osseointegration of rough acid-etched titanium implants: 5-year follow-up of 100 minimatic implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999; 14(3):384-91. View

Cunningham B, Orbegoso C, Dmitriev A, Hallab N, Sefter J, McAfee P . The effect of titanium particulate on development and maintenance of a posterolateral spinal arthrodesis: an in vivo rabbit model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 27(18):1971-81. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200209150-00004. View

Cunningham B, Orbegoso C, Dmitriev A, Hallab N, Sefter J, Asdourian P . The effect of spinal instrumentation particulate wear debris. an in vivo rabbit model and applied clinical study of retrieved instrumentation cases. Spine J. 2003; 3(1):19-32. DOI: 10.1016/s1529-9430(02)00443-6. View

Ha S, Kirch M, Birchler F, Eckert K, Mayer J, Wintermantel E . Surface activation of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and formation of calcium phosphate coatings by precipitation. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2004; 8(11):683-90. DOI: 10.1023/a:1018535923173. View

Yu S, Hariram K, Kumar R, Cheang P, Aik K . In vitro apatite formation and its growth kinetics on hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone biocomposites. Biomaterials. 2004; 26(15):2343-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.028. View

Pearce A, Richards R, Milz S, Schneider E, Pearce S . Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review. Eur Cell Mater. 2007; 13:1-10. DOI: 10.22203/ecm.v013a01. View

Kettler A, Liakos L, Haegele B, Wilke H . Are the spines of calf, pig and sheep suitable models for pre-clinical implant tests?. Eur Spine J. 2007; 16(12):2186-92. PMC: 2140126. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0485-9. View

Yao C, Storey D, Webster T . Nanostructured metal coatings on polymers increase osteoblast attachment. Int J Nanomedicine. 2007; 2(3):487-92. PMC: 2676648. View

Soegaard R, Bunger C, Christiansen T, Hoy K, Eiskjaer S, Christensen F . Circumferential fusion is dominant over posterolateral fusion in a long-term perspective: cost-utility evaluation of a randomized controlled trial in severe, chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(22):2405-14. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181573b2d. View

10.

Sagomonyants K, Jarman-Smith M, Devine J, Aronow M, Gronowicz G . The in vitro response of human osteoblasts to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) substrates compared to commercially pure titanium. Biomaterials. 2008; 29(11):1563-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.12.001. View

11.

Stenport V, Johansson C . Evaluations of bone tissue integration to pure and alloyed titanium implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008; 10(3):191-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00077.x. View

12.

Han X, Zhu Y, Cui C, Wu Y . A meta-analysis of circumferential fusion versus instrumented posterolateral fusion in the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(17):E618-25. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a9beab. View

13.

Sheng S, Wang X, Xu H, Zhu G, Zhou Y . Anatomy of large animal spines and its comparison to the human spine: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2009; 19(1):46-56. PMC: 2899734. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1192-5. View

14.

Niu C, Liao J, Chen W, Chen L . Outcomes of interbody fusion cages used in 1 and 2-levels anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: titanium cages versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010; 23(5):310-6. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181af3a84. View

15.

Han C, Lee E, Kim H, Koh Y, Kim K, Ha Y . The electron beam deposition of titanium on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and the resulting enhanced biological properties. Biomaterials. 2010; 31(13):3465-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.030. View

16.

Kim H, Kim K, Ki S, Choi Y . Electron Microprobe Analysis and Tissue Reaction around Titanium Alloy Spinal Implants. Asian Spine J. 2010; 1(1):1-7. PMC: 2857498. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2007.1.1.1. View

17.

Olivares-Navarrete R, Gittens R, Schneider J, Hyzy S, Haithcock D, Ullrich P . Osteoblasts exhibit a more differentiated phenotype and increased bone morphogenetic protein production on titanium alloy substrates than on poly-ether-ether-ketone. Spine J. 2012; 12(3):265-72. PMC: 3618467. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.02.002. View

18.

Pelletier M, Cordaro N, Punjabi V, Waites M, Lau A, Walsh W . PEEK Versus Ti Interbody Fusion Devices: Resultant Fusion, Bone Apposition, Initial and 26-Week Biomechanics. Clin Spine Surg. 2012; 29(4):E208-14. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826851a4. View

19.

Duncan J, Bailey R . An analysis of fusion cage migration in unilateral and bilateral fixation with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2012; 22(2):439-45. PMC: 3555613. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2458-x. View

20.

Olivares-Navarrete R, Hyzy S, Gittens 1st R, Schneider J, Haithcock D, Ullrich P . Rough titanium alloys regulate osteoblast production of angiogenic factors. Spine J. 2013; 13(11):1563-70. PMC: 3785549. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.047. View