Attentional Capture by Simultaneous Pleasant and Unpleasant Emotional Distractors

Overview

Journal Emotion

Publisher American Psychological Association

Specialty Psychology

Date 2018 Mar 2

PMID 29494204

Citations 3

Authors

Srikanth Padmala

Nicola Sambuco

Maurizio Codispoti

Luiz Pessoa

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Both high-arousal pleasant and unpleasant task-irrelevant stimuli capture attention and divert processing away from the main task leading to impaired behavioral performance in concurrent tasks. Most studies have separately investigated interference effects of unpleasant and pleasant stimuli on behavior. Thus, little is known about how pleasant and unpleasant task-irrelevant stimuli influence behavior simultaneously. In the present study, we investigated this question during a visual-letter search task. We tested two alternative hypotheses about the influence of simultaneous pleasant and unpleasant task-irrelevant stimuli on task performance. If behavior is purely determined by the intensity of the distractor stimuli (independent of valence), then we would expect the interference effect of simultaneous pleasant and unpleasant distractors to be similar to the influence of two pleasant or two unpleasant distractor stimuli. In contrast, because of opponent interactions between appetitive and aversive motivational systems, the interference effect of simultaneous pleasant and unpleasant stimuli might be weakened. We found that the interference effect of a compound pleasant-plus-unpleasant stimulus was greater than that of a neutral-plus-emotional stimulus and similar to that of two pleasant or two unpleasant stimuli. These results suggest that at the level of behavior, the influence of joint pleasant and unpleasant task-irrelevant stimuli during perception is mainly determined by the intensity of the stimuli, and independent of their valence. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Citing Articles

Electrophysiological normative responses to emotional, neutral, and cigarette-related images.

Versace F, Sambuco N, Deweese M, Cinciripini P Psychophysiology. 2022; 60(3):e14196.

PMID: 36316228 PMC: 10166608. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14196.

Influence of Attention Control on Implicit and Explicit Emotion Processing of Face and Body: Evidence From Flanker and Same-or-Different Paradigms.

Oldrati V, Bardoni A, Poggi G, Urgesi C Front Psychol. 2020; 10:2971.

PMID: 32038372 PMC: 6985560. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02971.

The Time Course of Dorsal and Rostral-Ventral Anterior Cingulate Cortex Activity in the Emotional Stroop Experiment Reveals Valence and Arousal Aberrant Modulation in Patients with Schizophrenia.

Feroz F, Leicht G, Rauh J, Mulert C Brain Topogr. 2018; 32(1):161-177.

PMID: 30288663 PMC: 6327077. DOI: 10.1007/s10548-018-0677-0.

References

Mocaiber I, Sanchez T, Pereira M, Erthal F, Joffily M, Araujo D . Antecedent descriptions change brain reactivity to emotional stimuli: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of an extrinsic and incidental reappraisal strategy. Neuroscience. 2011; 193:241-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.07.003. View

Gupta R, Hur Y, Lavie N . Distracted by pleasure: Effects of positive versus negative valence on emotional capture under load. Emotion. 2015; 16(3):328-37. DOI: 10.1037/emo0000112. View

Sennwald V, Pool E, Brosch T, Delplanque S, Bianchi-Demicheli F, Sander D . Emotional attention for erotic stimuli: Cognitive and brain mechanisms. J Comp Neurol. 2015; 524(8):1668-75. DOI: 10.1002/cne.23859. View

Schimmack U, Derryberry D . Attentional interference effects of emotional pictures: threat, negativity, or arousal?. Emotion. 2005; 5(1):55-66. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.55. View

Jin J, Zelano C, Gottfried J, Mohanty A . Human Amygdala Represents the Complete Spectrum of Subjective Valence. J Neurosci. 2015; 35(45):15145-56. PMC: 4642243. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2450-15.2015. View

Bradley M, Sabatinelli D, Lang P, Fitzsimmons J, King W, Desai P . Activation of the visual cortex in motivated attention. Behav Neurosci. 2003; 117(2):369-80. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.117.2.369. View

Kahnt T, Tobler P . Salience signals in the right temporoparietal junction facilitate value-based decisions. J Neurosci. 2013; 33(3):863-9. PMC: 6704859. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3531-12.2013. View

Rohr C, Villringer A, Solms-Baruth C, van der Meer E, Margulies D, Okon-Singer H . The neural networks of subjectively evaluated emotional conflicts. Hum Brain Mapp. 2016; 37(6):2234-46. PMC: 6867502. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23169. View

Pourtois G, Schettino A, Vuilleumier P . Brain mechanisms for emotional influences on perception and attention: what is magic and what is not. Biol Psychol. 2012; 92(3):492-512. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.02.007. View

10.

Kim J, Pignatelli M, Xu S, Itohara S, Tonegawa S . Antagonistic negative and positive neurons of the basolateral amygdala. Nat Neurosci. 2016; 19(12):1636-1646. PMC: 5493320. DOI: 10.1038/nn.4414. View

11.

Winston J, Gottfried J, Kilner J, Dolan R . Integrated neural representations of odor intensity and affective valence in human amygdala. J Neurosci. 2005; 25(39):8903-7. PMC: 6725588. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1569-05.2005. View

12.

Fernandez-Martin A, Calvo M . Selective orienting to pleasant versus unpleasant visual scenes. Cognition. 2016; 155:108-112. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.06.010. View

13.

Okon-Singer H, Tzelgov J, Henik A . Distinguishing between automaticity and attention in the processing of emotionally significant stimuli. Emotion. 2007; 7(1):147-57. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.1.147. View

14.

Pool E, Brosch T, Delplanque S, Sander D . Attentional bias for positive emotional stimuli: A meta-analytic investigation. Psychol Bull. 2015; 142(1):79-106. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000026. View

15.

Okon-Singer H, Lichtenstein-Vidne L, Cohen N . Dynamic modulation of emotional processing. Biol Psychol. 2012; 92(3):480-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.05.010. View

16.

Calvo M, Gutierrez-Garcia A, Del Libano M . Sensitivity to emotional scene content outside the focus of attention. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015; 161:36-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.08.002. View

17.

Bradley M, Codispoti M, Cuthbert B, Lang P . Emotion and motivation I: defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion. 2003; 1(3):276-98. View

18.

Codispoti M, De Cesarei A, Biondi S, Ferrari V . The fate of unattended stimuli and emotional habituation: Behavioral interference and cortical changes. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016; 16(6):1063-1073. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-016-0453-0. View

19.

Codispoti M, De Cesarei A . Arousal and attention: picture size and emotional reactions. Psychophysiology. 2007; 44(5):680-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00545.x. View

20.

Carretie L . Exogenous (automatic) attention to emotional stimuli: a review. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014; 14(4):1228-58. PMC: 4218981. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-014-0270-2. View