» Articles » PMID: 29492989

Carvedilol for Reducing Portal Pressure in Primary Prophylaxis of Variceal Bleeding: a Dose-response Study

Overview
Date 2018 Mar 2
PMID 29492989
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Sequential measurements of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) are used to assess the haemodynamic response to nonselective betablockers (NSBBs) in patients with portal hypertension.

Aims: To assess the rates of HVPG response to different doses of carvedilol.

Methods: Consecutive patients with cirrhosis undergoing HVPG-guided carvedilol therapy for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding between 08/2010 and 05/2015 were retrospectively included. After baseline HVPG measurement, carvedilol 6.25 mg/d was administered and HVPG response (HVPG-decrease ≥20% or to ≤12 mm Hg) was assessed after 3-4 weeks. In case of nonresponse, carvedilol dose was increased to 12.5 mg/d and a third HVPG-measurement was performed after 3-4 weeks. We also assessed HVPG-response rates according to the Baveno VI consensus (HVPG decrease ≥10% or to ≤12 mm Hg) and changes in systolic arterial pressure (SAP).

Results: Seventy-two patients (Child A, 37%; B, 35%; C, 28%) were included. 28 (39%) patients achieved a HVPG-decrease ≥ 20% with carvedilol 6.25 mg/d and another 10 (14%) with carvedilol 12.5 mg/d. Forty (56%) patients had a HVPG decrease ≥10% with carvedilol 6.25 mg/d and 24 (33%) with carvedilol 12.5 mg/d. Thus, in total, a HVPG-response of ≥20% and ≥10% and was achieved in 38 (53%) and 55 (76%) and of patients respectively. Notably, 6 patients (n = 4 with ascites) did not tolerate an increase to 12.5 mg/d due to hypotension/bradycardia. However, none of the other patients had a SAP < 90 mm Hg at the final HVPG measurement.

Conclusion: Carvedilol 12.5 mg/d was more effective than 6.25 mg/d in decreasing HVPG in primary prophylaxis. A total of 76% of patients achieved a HVPG-response of ≥ 10% to carvedilol 12.5 mg/d, however, arterial hypotension might occur, especially in patients with ascites.

Citing Articles

Population screening for cirrhosis.

Thiele M, Pose E, Juanola A, Mellinger J, Gines P Hepatol Commun. 2024; 8(9).

PMID: 39185917 PMC: 11357699. DOI: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000512.


Efficacy and safety of variceal embolization for primary prophylaxis in cirrhosis patients with challenges in standard treatments: preliminary results.

Tie J, Yuan X, Zhu Y, Li K, Gou X, Han N Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1401900.

PMID: 39076764 PMC: 11284067. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1401900.


The Balloon Catheter Method and the End-hole Catheter Method in the Measurement of Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient: a Comparative Study.

Yu J, Yang S, Wang Y, Li J, Su T, Chang J Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024; 47(10):1356-1362.

PMID: 39060793 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-024-03814-w.


Carvedilol to prevent decompensation of cirrhosis in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension stratified by liver stiffness: study protocol for a randomied, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial in China.

Liu C, Zhang L, Zhang S, Li X, Wong Y, Liang X BMJ Open. 2024; 14(7):e081623.

PMID: 38991669 PMC: 11243284. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081623.


Statins, metformin, and RAS inhibitors did not reduce variceal bleeding risk and mortality in a large, real-life cohort of patients with cirrhosis.

Pfisterer N, Schwarz M, Schwarz C, Putre F, Ritt L, Riedl F PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0302811.

PMID: 38870117 PMC: 11175511. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302811.