» Articles » PMID: 29492613

A Moderate Dose of Alcohol Selectively Reduces Empathic Accuracy

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2018 Mar 2
PMID 29492613
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale: Drinking alcohol is associated with various interpersonal effects, including effects on cognitive empathy. Empathic accuracy (EA) is a form of cognitive empathy concerned with perceivers' accuracy in inferring a target's thoughts and feelings. The effects of alcohol on EA have not previously been studied.

Objectives: We examined the effect of a moderate alcohol dose on EA in social drinkers.

Methods: Fifty-four men with varying levels of hazardous drinking according to the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) participated in a randomized, double-blind, between-group study. The alcohol group received 0.56 g/kg alcohol in a vodka and tonic-mixed drink. The placebo group received tonic, with 4 ml of vodka sprayed on top. All participants performed an EA task that involved watching 16 videos of people narrating positive and negative emotional autobiographical events and continuously rating how targets felt while narrating.

Results: There were no significant main effects of beverage condition on the EA task. There was an effect of the condition by AUDIT interaction for EA on the positive videos. Post-hoc simple contrasts revealed that in participants with lower AUDIT scores, the alcohol condition had lower EA for positive videos than the placebo condition. No significant main effect for condition occurred in the participants with higher AUDIT scores.

Conclusions: The effect of condition in participants with lower AUDIT scores indicates alcohol selectively reduced EA in individuals low on hazardous drinking. This suggests either alcohol-induced impairments of EA for positive events or a positivity bias in men at low risk for alcohol dependency.

Citing Articles

Victims of Bullying: Emotion Recognition and Understanding.

Franzen M, de Jong P, Veling W, Aan Het Rot M Front Psychol. 2021; 12:729835.

PMID: 34721191 PMC: 8551375. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.729835.

References
1.
Hogenelst K, Schoevers R, Aan Het Rot M . Studying the neurobiology of human social interaction: Making the case for ecological validity. Soc Neurosci. 2015; 10(3):219-29. DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2014.994786. View

2.
Castellano F, Bartoli F, Crocamo C, Gamba G, Tremolada M, Santambrogio J . Facial emotion recognition in alcohol and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015; 59:147-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.11.001. View

3.
DHondt F, Campanella S, Kornreich C, Philippot P, Maurage P . Below and beyond the recognition of emotional facial expressions in alcohol dependence: from basic perception to social cognition. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014; 10:2177-82. PMC: 4242687. DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S74963. View

4.
Giancola P, Parrott D . Further evidence for the validity of the Taylor Aggression Paradigm. Aggress Behav. 2007; 34(2):214-29. DOI: 10.1002/ab.20235. View

5.
Uekermann J, Daum I . Social cognition in alcoholism: a link to prefrontal cortex dysfunction?. Addiction. 2008; 103(5):726-35. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02157.x. View