» Articles » PMID: 29491947

Navigating the Currents of Seascape Genomics: How Spatial Analyses Can Augment Population Genomic Studies

Overview
Journal Curr Zool
Date 2018 Mar 2
PMID 29491947
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Population genomic approaches are making rapid inroads in the study of non-model organisms, including marine taxa. To date, these marine studies have predominantly focused on rudimentary metrics describing the spatial and environmental context of their study region (e.g., geographical distance, average sea surface temperature, average salinity). We contend that a more nuanced and considered approach to quantifying seascape dynamics and patterns can strengthen population genomic investigations and help identify spatial, temporal, and environmental factors associated with differing selective regimes or demographic histories. Nevertheless, approaches for quantifying marine landscapes are complicated. Characteristic features of the marine environment, including pelagic living in flowing water (experienced by most marine taxa at some point in their life cycle), require a well-designed spatial-temporal sampling strategy and analysis. Many genetic summary statistics used to describe populations may be inappropriate for marine species with large population sizes, large species ranges, stochastic recruitment, and asymmetrical gene flow. Finally, statistical approaches for testing associations between seascapes and population genomic patterns are still maturing with no single approach able to capture all relevant considerations. None of these issues are completely unique to marine systems and therefore similar issues and solutions will be shared for many organisms regardless of habitat. Here, we outline goals and spatial approaches for landscape genomics with an emphasis on marine systems and review the growing empirical literature on seascape genomics. We review established tools and approaches and highlight promising new strategies to overcome select issues including a strategy to spatially optimize sampling. Despite the many challenges, we argue that marine systems may be especially well suited for identifying candidate genomic regions under environmentally mediated selection and that seascape genomic approaches are especially useful for identifying robust locus-by-environment associations.

Citing Articles

Selection Over Small and Large Spatial Scales in the Face of High Gene Flow.

Rumberger C, Rumberger C, Armstrong M, Armstrong M, Kim M, Kim M Mol Ecol. 2025; 34(6):e17700.

PMID: 39968778 PMC: 11874683. DOI: 10.1111/mec.17700.


Genetic Diversity and Environmental Adaptation Signatures of the Great Seahorse () in the Coastal Regions of the Indo-Pacific as Revealed by Whole-Genome Re-Sequencing.

Hao W, Zhang Y, Wang X, Qu M, Wan S, Lin Q Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(3).

PMID: 39941154 PMC: 11818898. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26031387.


Seascape Genomics of the Smooth Hammerhead Shark Reveals Regional Adaptive Clinal Variation.

Grobler D, Klein J, Dicken M, Mmonwa K, Soekoe M, van Staden M Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(12):e70644.

PMID: 39669504 PMC: 11635309. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70644.


Climate adaptive loci revealed by seascape genomics correlate with phenotypic variation in heat tolerance of the coral Acropora millepora.

Denis H, Selmoni O, Gossuin H, Jauffrais T, Butler C, Lecellier G Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):22179.

PMID: 39333135 PMC: 11436834. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67971-1.


Assessing Mechanisms of Potential Local Adaptation Through a Seascape Genomic Approach in a Marine Gastropod, Littoraria flava.

Cortez T, Sonoda G, Santos C, Andrade S Genome Biol Evol. 2024; 16(9).

PMID: 39235041 PMC: 11413584. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evae194.


References
1.
Puritz J, Hollenbeck C, Gold J . dDocent: a RADseq, variant-calling pipeline designed for population genomics of non-model organisms. PeerJ. 2014; 2:e431. PMC: 4060032. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.431. View

2.
Xue A, Hickerson M . The aggregate site frequency spectrum for comparative population genomic inference. Mol Ecol. 2016; 24(24):6223-40. PMC: 4717917. DOI: 10.1111/mec.13447. View

3.
Colosimo P, Hosemann K, Balabhadra S, Villarreal Jr G, Dickson M, Grimwood J . Widespread parallel evolution in sticklebacks by repeated fixation of Ectodysplasin alleles. Science. 2005; 307(5717):1928-33. DOI: 10.1126/science.1107239. View

4.
Gagnaire P, Broquet T, Aurelle D, Viard F, Souissi A, Bonhomme F . Using neutral, selected, and hitchhiker loci to assess connectivity of marine populations in the genomic era. Evol Appl. 2015; 8(8):769-86. PMC: 4561567. DOI: 10.1111/eva.12288. View

5.
Guo B, DeFaveri J, Sotelo G, Nair A, Merila J . Population genomic evidence for adaptive differentiation in Baltic Sea three-spined sticklebacks. BMC Biol. 2015; 13:19. PMC: 4410466. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-015-0130-8. View