Genetic Diseases and Information to Relatives: Practical and Ethical Issues for Professionals After Introduction of a Legal Framework in France

Overview

Journal Eur J Hum Genet

Specialty Genetics

Date 2018 Mar 1

PMID 29487415

Citations 11

Authors

Diane dAudiffret Van Haecke

Sandrine de Montgolfier

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Health professionals have a role to play in assisting patients to communicate genetic information to their relatives. In France, a specific unique legal framework has been implemented concerning this issue. We questioned professionals about their practice and how it has evolved in this new frame. The French law has opted to lay responsibility for disclosure on the person concerned by a positive test result, without totally excluding some responsibility on the part of the professionals involved, in the information to be disclosed and in the transmission of the information if a patient refuses to do it themselves (indirect disclosure). We designed and validated an online survey to be sent out to healthcare professionals to explore their practice and how they went about implementing the legal provisions. We also sought to determine how healthcare professionals dealt with a patient's refusal to disclose information to their relatives, and whether the legal framework was helpful. We carried out a statistical analysis of the responses to questionnaires to interpret the results by professional category, field of medicine and genetic disorder. The results show that professionals agreed on the relevance of disclosure to relatives. However, they show a range of practices and varying representations of the genetic issue in the framework of disclosure to relatives according to their medical field, their role in the health system and their own interpretations. They indicated a lack of resources, raised some ethical issues and put forward some arguments against contacting relatives themselves.

Citing Articles

Cascade genetic testing in hereditary cancer: exploring the boundaries of the Italian legal framework.

Varesco L, Di Tano F, Monducci J, Sciallero S, Turchetti D, Bighin C Fam Cancer. 2024; 24(1):9.

PMID: 39565467 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-024-00430-y.

Clinician perspectives on policy approaches to genetic risk disclosure in families.

Phillips A, Vears D, Van Hoyweghen I, Borry P Fam Cancer. 2024; 23(2):177-186.

PMID: 38548926 PMC: 11233314. DOI: 10.1007/s10689-024-00375-2.

Direct notification by health professionals of relatives at-risk of genetic conditions (with patient consent): views of the Australian public.

Tiller J, Stott A, Finlay K, Boughtwood T, Madelli E, Horton A Eur J Hum Genet. 2023; 32(1):98-108.

PMID: 37280361 PMC: 10242214. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01395-9.

A genetic researcher's devil's dilemma: Warn relatives about their genetic risk or respect confidentiality agreements with research participants?.

van den Heuvel L, Maeckelberghe E, Ploem M, Christiaans I BMC Med Ethics. 2021; 22(1):155.

PMID: 34814911 PMC: 8609755. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00721-4.

How do non-geneticist physicians deal with genetic tests? A qualitative analysis.

Pasquier L, Minguet G, Moisdon-Chataigner S, Jarno P, Denizeau P, Volf G Eur J Hum Genet. 2021; 30(3):320-331.

PMID: 33907318 PMC: 8904857. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00884-z.

References

Lenk C, Frommeld D . Different concepts and models of information for family-relevant genetic findings: comparison and ethical analysis. Med Health Care Philos. 2015; 18(3):393-408. DOI: 10.1007/s11019-015-9638-5. View

Mendes A, Paneque M, Sousa L, Clarke A, Sequeiros J . How communication of genetic information within the family is addressed in genetic counselling: a systematic review of research evidence. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015; 24(3):315-25. PMC: 4755382. DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.174. View

Godard B, Hurlimann T, Letendre M, Egalite N . Guidelines for disclosing genetic information to family members: from development to use. Fam Cancer. 2006; 5(1):103-16. DOI: 10.1007/s10689-005-2581-5. View

Gaff C, Clarke A, Atkinson P, Sivell S, Elwyn G, Iredale R . Process and outcome in communication of genetic information within families: a systematic review. Eur J Hum Genet. 2007; 15(10):999-1011. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201883. View

Dheensa S, Fenwick A, Lucassen A . Approaching confidentiality at a familial level in genomic medicine: a focus group study with healthcare professionals. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(2):e012443. PMC: 5293977. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012443. View

Resta R . Defining and redefining the scope and goals of genetic counseling. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2006; 142C(4):269-75. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30093. View

Stol Y, Menko F, Westerman M, Janssens R . Informing family members about a hereditary predisposition to cancer: attitudes and practices among clinical geneticists. J Med Ethics. 2010; 36(7):391-5. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2009.033324. View

Cordier C, Taris N, de Pauw A, Sobol H, Philip N, Voelckel M . French professionals in genetic counselor careers. J Genet Couns. 2013; 22(6):844-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9599-x. View

Forrest L, Delatycki M, Skene L, Aitken M . Communicating genetic information in families--a review of guidelines and position papers. Eur J Hum Genet. 2007; 15(6):612-8. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201822. View

10.

Wouters R, Bijlsma R, Ausems M, van Delden J, Voest E, Bredenoord A . Am I My Family's Keeper? Disclosure Dilemmas in Next-Generation Sequencing. Hum Mutat. 2016; 37(12):1257-1262. DOI: 10.1002/humu.23118. View

11.

D Audiffret Van Haecke D, Montgolfier S . Genetic Test Results and Disclosure to Family Members: Qualitative Interviews of Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions of Ethical and Professional Issues in France. J Genet Couns. 2015; 25(3):483-94. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9896-7. View

12.

Kerzin-Storrar L, Wright C, Williamson P, Fryer A, Njindou A, Quarrell O . Comparison of genetic services with and without genetic registers: access and attitudes to genetic counselling services among relatives of genetic clinic patients. J Med Genet. 2002; 39(12):e85. PMC: 1757217. DOI: 10.1136/jmg.39.12.e85. View

13.

Derbez B, de Pauw A, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Montgolfier S . Supporting disclosure of genetic information to family members: professional practice and timelines in cancer genetics. Fam Cancer. 2017; 16(3):447-457. DOI: 10.1007/s10689-017-9970-4. View

14.

Barnoy S, Tabak N . Israeli nurses and genetic information disclosure. Nurs Ethics. 2007; 14(3):280-94. DOI: 10.1177/0969733007075862. View

15.

Forrest L, Delatycki M, Curnow L, Skene L, Aitken M . Genetic health professionals and the communication of genetic information in families: Practice during and after a genetic consultation. Am J Med Genet A. 2010; 152A(6):1458-66. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33385. View

16.

Dheensa S, Fenwick A, Shkedi-Rafid S, Crawford G, Lucassen A . Health-care professionals' responsibility to patients' relatives in genetic medicine: a systematic review and synthesis of empirical research. Genet Med. 2015; 18(4):290-301. PMC: 4823639. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2015.72. View

17.

Suthers G, Armstrong J, McCormack J, Trott D . Letting the family know: balancing ethics and effectiveness when notifying relatives about genetic testing for a familial disorder. J Med Genet. 2005; 43(8):665-70. PMC: 2564590. DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2005.039172. View

18.

Kardashian A, Fehniger J, Creasman J, Cheung E, Beattie M . A Pilot study of the Sharing Risk Information Tool (ShaRIT) for Families with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2012; 10(1):4. PMC: 3351367. DOI: 10.1186/1897-4287-10-4. View

19.

Gilbar R, Foster C . DOCTORS' LIABILITY TO THE PATIENT'S RELATIVES IN GENETIC MEDICINE: ABC V St George's Healthcare NHS trust[2015] EWHC 1394 (QB). Med Law Rev. 2015; 24(1):112-23. DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwv037. View