» Articles » PMID: 29486003

Clinical Spectrum and Risk Factors Associated with Asymptomatic Erosive Esophagitis As Determined by Los Angeles Classification: A Cross-sectional Study

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Feb 28
PMID 29486003
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Gastro esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic and recurrent disease, and it varies in regions. However, to date, there are no reports available on clinical features and the risk factors for the asymptomatic reflux esophagitis in Nepalese adults.

Methods: Data were gathered from 142 erosive patients who had undergone endoscopy at Bir Hospital, Kathmandu. Los Angeles classification was used to grade the severity of the disease. Patients were interviewed to find out the presence of various reflux symptoms.

Results: Based on the Los Angeles classification, the severity of the disease assessed was; grade A 31.8% (31/142), grade B 39.4% (56/142), grade C 33.8% (48/142), and grade D 4.9% (7/142). One hundred and twenty six (88.7%) subjects had reflux symptoms. Prevalence of asymptomatic esophagitis was 16(11.3%). Age was independently linked to asymptomatic esophagitis (P<0.05), and the odd of being asymptomatic appeared lower in younger adults (P<0.05; OR: 0.118; CI: 0.014-.994).

Conclusion: A low prevalence of asymptomatic reflux esophagitis (RE) was seen. Most subjects experienced mild to moderate RE. Age remained an independent factor associated with reflux esophagitis, and the odds of being asymptomatic was lower in younger age.

Citing Articles

Asymptomatic Erosive Esophagitis.

Du Y, Spencer A, Roy P, Abdulhamid A, Dalessio S, Levenick J Dig Dis Sci. 2024; 70(2):462-468.

PMID: 39694991 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-024-08793-z.


Clinical outcomes of asymptomatic low-grade esophagitis: results from a multicenter Chinese cohort.

Chen S, Xiang X, Zhang X, Zhuang Q, Tan N, Hou X Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2022; 10:goac057.

PMID: 36263392 PMC: 9562142. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goac057.


Local inflammatory response to gastroesophageal reflux: Association of gene expression of inflammatory cytokines with esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH data.

Morozov S, Sentsova T World J Clin Cases. 2022; 10(26):9254-9263.

PMID: 36159432 PMC: 9477692. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i26.9254.


Characteristics of high-resolution esophageal manometry in children without dysphagia.

Kovacic K, Kern M, Pawela L, Shaker R, Sood M Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021; 34(2):e14184.

PMID: 34089288 PMC: 10128867. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14184.


Correlation of Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (pCLE) and Mucosal Integrity Testing (MIT) with Epithelial Barrier Function and Presence of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD).

Mutha P, Fasullo M, Chu S, Schubert M, Zfass A, Cooper P Dig Dis Sci. 2021; 67(5):1773-1782.

PMID: 33939145 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-06980-w.


References
1.
Fass R, Dickman R . Clinical consequences of silent gastroesophageal reflux disease. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2006; 8(3):195-201. DOI: 10.1007/s11894-006-0075-8. View

2.
Wang F, Tu M, Chuang H, Yu H, Cheng L, Hsu P . Erosive esophagitis in asymptomatic subjects: risk factors. Dig Dis Sci. 2009; 55(5):1320-4. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-009-0888-z. View

3.
Lundell L, Dent J, Bennett J, Blum A, Armstrong D, Galmiche J . Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut. 1999; 45(2):172-80. PMC: 1727604. DOI: 10.1136/gut.45.2.172. View

4.
Johnsson F, Joelsson B, Gudmundsson K, Greiff L . Symptoms and endoscopic findings in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1987; 22(6):714-8. DOI: 10.3109/00365528709011148. View

5.
Chen T, Chang F . The prevalence and risk factors of reflux esophagitis among adult Chinese population in Taiwan. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007; 41(9):819-22. DOI: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000225658.30803.79. View