» Articles » PMID: 29483070

Enhancing Survivorship Care Planning for Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Using a Couple-Focused MHealth Symptom Self-Management Program: Protocol for a Feasibility Study

Overview
Journal JMIR Res Protoc
Publisher JMIR Publications
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2018 Feb 28
PMID 29483070
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This project explores a new model of care that enhances survivorship care planning and promotes health for men with localized prostate cancer transitioning to posttreatment self-management. Survivorship care planning is important for patients with prostate cancer because of its high incidence rate in the United States, the frequent occurrence of treatment-related side effects, and reduced quality of life (QOL) for both men and their partners. A key component of comprehensive survivorship care planning is survivorship care plans (SCPs), documents that summarize cancer diagnosis, treatment, and plans for follow-up care. However, research concerning the effectiveness of SCPs on patient outcomes or health service use has thus far been inconclusive. SCPs that are tailored to individual patients' needs for information and care may improve effectiveness.

Objective: This study aims to examine the feasibility of an enhanced survivorship care plan (ESCP) that integrates a symptom self-management mHealth program called Prostate Cancer Education and Resources for Couples (PERC) into the existing standardized SCP. The specific aims are to (1) examine the feasibility of delivering ESCPs and (2) to estimate the magnitude of benefit of ESCPs.

Methods: We will use a two-group randomized controlled pretest-posttest design and collect data at baseline (T1) and 4 months later (T2) among 50 patients completing initial treatment for localized prostate cancer and their partners. First, we will assess the feasibility of ESCP by recruitment, enrollment, and retention rates; program satisfaction with the ESCP; and perceived ease of use of the ESCP. To achieve the secondary aim, we will compare the ESCP users with the standardized SCP users and assess their primary outcomes of QOL (overall, physical, emotional, and social QOL); secondary outcomes (reduction in negative appraisals and improvement in self-efficacy, social support, and health behaviors to manage symptoms); and number of visits to posttreatment care services between T1 and T2. We will assess the primary and secondary outcomes using measurements with sound psychometrical properties. We will use a qualitative and quantitative mixed methods approach to achieve the research aims.

Results: This project is ongoing and will be completed by the end of 2018.

Conclusions: The results from this study will help design a definitive randomized trial to test the efficacy of the ESCPs, a potentially scalable program, to enhance supportive care for prostate cancer patients and their families.

Citing Articles

Exploring Interactive Survivorship Care Plans to Support Breast Cancer Survivors: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Kapoor A, Nambisan P JMIR Res Protoc. 2020; 9(12):e23414.

PMID: 33274725 PMC: 7748955. DOI: 10.2196/23414.


Virtual care models for cancer survivorship.

Pham Q, Hearn J, Gao B, Brown I, Hamilton R, Berlin A NPJ Digit Med. 2020; 3:113.

PMID: 32923690 PMC: 7468136. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-020-00321-3.


Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome-Based Interventions for Palliative Cancer Care: A Systematic and Mapping Review.

Karamanidou C, Natsiavas P, Koumakis L, Marias K, Schera F, Schafer M JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020; 4:647-656.

PMID: 32697604 PMC: 7397776. DOI: 10.1200/CCI.20.00015.


Enhancing survivorship care planning for patients with localized prostate cancer using a couple-focused web-based, mHealth program: the results of a pilot feasibility study.

Song L, Guo P, Tan X, Chen R, Nielsen M, Birken S J Cancer Surviv. 2020; 15(1):99-108.

PMID: 32681304 PMC: 7855003. DOI: 10.1007/s11764-020-00914-7.


Co-morbidities in a Retrospective Cohort of Prostate Cancer Patients.

Jefferson M, Drake R, Lilly M, Savage S, Price S, Halbert C Ethn Dis. 2020; 30(Suppl 1):185-192.

PMID: 32269460 PMC: 7138439. DOI: 10.18865/ed.30.S1.185.


References
1.
Hoekstra R, Heins M, Korevaar J . Health care needs of cancer survivors in general practice: a systematic review. BMC Fam Pract. 2014; 15:94. PMC: 4031325. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-94. View

2.
Ezendam N, Nicolaije K, Kruitwagen R, Pijnenborg J, Caroline Vos M, Boll D . Survivorship Care Plans to inform the primary care physician: results from the ROGY care pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. J Cancer Surviv. 2014; 8(4):595-602. DOI: 10.1007/s11764-014-0368-0. View

3.
Chambers S, Schover L, Halford K, Ferguson M, Gardiner R, Occhipinti S . ProsCan for Couples: a feasibility study for evaluating peer support within a controlled research design. Psychooncology. 2011; 22(2):475-9. DOI: 10.1002/pon.2110. View

4.
Vest B, Kahn L, Danzo A, Tumiel-Berhalter L, Schuster R, Karl R . Diabetes self-management in a low-income population: impacts of social support and relationships with the health care system. Chronic Illn. 2013; 9(2):145-55. PMC: 3895933. DOI: 10.1177/1742395313475674. View

5.
Quan H, Li B, Couris C, Fushimi K, Graham P, Hider P . Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol. 2011; 173(6):676-82. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwq433. View