» Articles » PMID: 29482411

A Triangulated Qualitative Study of Veteran Decision-Making to Seek Care During Heart Failure Exacerbation: Implications of Dual Health System Use

Overview
Journal Inquiry
Date 2018 Feb 28
PMID 29482411
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Among Veterans, heart failure (HF) contributes to frequent emergency department visits and hospitalization. Dual health care system use (dual use) occurs when Veterans Health Administration (VA) enrollees also receive care from non-VA sources. Mounting evidence suggests that dual use decreases efficiency and patient safety. This qualitative study used constructivist grounded theory and content analysis to examine decision making among 25 Veterans with HF, for similarities and differences between all-VA users and dual users. In general, all-VA users praised specific VA providers, called services helpful, and expressed positive capacity for managing HF. In addition, several Veterans who described inadvertent one-time non-VA health care utilization in emergent situations more closely mirrored all-VA users. By contrast, committed dual users more often reported unmet needs, nonresponse to VA requests, and faster services in non-VA facilities. However, a primary trigger for dual use was VA telephone referral for escalating symptoms, instead of care coordination or primary/specialty care problem-solving.

Citing Articles

Dual Healthcare System Use During Episodes of Acute Care Heart Failure Associated With Higher Healthcare Utilization and Mortality Risk.

Axon R, Gebregziabher M, Everett C, Heidenreich P, Hunt K J Am Heart Assoc. 2018; 7(15):e009054.

PMID: 30371248 PMC: 6201461. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009054.


A review of dual health care system use by veterans with cardiometabolic disease.

Coughlin S, Young L J Hosp Manag Health Policy. 2018; 2.

PMID: 30198018 PMC: 6126671. DOI: 10.21037/jhmhp.2018.07.05.

References
1.
Wolinsky F, Miller T, An H, Brezinski P, Vaughn T, Rosenthal G . Dual use of Medicare and the Veterans Health Administration: are there adverse health outcomes?. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006; 6:131. PMC: 1617101. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-131. View

2.
Ross J, Mulvey G, Stauffer B, Patlolla V, Bernheim S, Keenan P . Statistical models and patient predictors of readmission for heart failure: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2008; 168(13):1371-86. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.168.13.1371. View

3.
Lupon J, Vila J, Bayes-Genis A . Risk prediction tools in patients with heart failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2015; 3(3):267. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2014.10.010. View

4.
Hernandez A, Fonarow G, Liang L, Heidenreich P, Yancy C, Peterson E . The need for multiple measures of hospital quality: results from the Get with the Guidelines-Heart Failure Registry of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011; 124(6):712-9. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.026088. View

5.
Horowitz C, Rein S, Leventhal H . A story of maladies, misconceptions and mishaps: effective management of heart failure. Soc Sci Med. 2003; 58(3):631-43. PMC: 4301306. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00232-6. View