Why Checking Model Assumptions Using Null Hypothesis Significance Tests Does Not Suffice: A Plea for Plausibility
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
This article explores whether the null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) framework provides a sufficient basis for the evaluation of statistical model assumptions. It is argued that while NHST-based tests can provide some degree of confirmation for the model assumption that is evaluated-formulated as the null hypothesis-these tests do not inform us of the degree of support that the data provide for the null hypothesis and to what extent the null hypothesis should be considered to be plausible after having taken the data into account. Addressing the prior plausibility of the model assumption is unavoidable if the goal is to determine how plausible it is that the model assumption holds. Without assessing the prior plausibility of the model assumptions, it remains fully uncertain whether the model of interest gives an adequate description of the data and thus whether it can be considered valid for the application at hand. Although addressing the prior plausibility is difficult, ignoring the prior plausibility is not an option if we want to claim that the inferences of our statistical model can be relied upon.
Shatz I Behav Res Methods. 2023; 56(2):826-845.
PMID: 36869217 PMC: 10830673. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-023-02072-x.
Zhong Y, Zhou L, Liu X, Deng L, Wu R, Xia Z Infect Dis Ther. 2021; 10(2):985-999.
PMID: 33861420 PMC: 8051286. DOI: 10.1007/s40121-021-00429-3.
The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis.
van Doorn J, den Bergh D, Bohm U, Dablander F, Derks K, Draws T Psychon Bull Rev. 2020; 28(3):813-826.
PMID: 33037582 PMC: 8219590. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01798-5.
Bayes Factors for Evaluating Latent Monotonicity in Polytomous Item Response Theory Models.
Tijmstra J, Bolsinova M Psychometrika. 2019; 84(3):846-869.
PMID: 30793230 PMC: 6820449. DOI: 10.1007/s11336-019-09661-w.