» Articles » PMID: 29476193

[Psychosocial Effects in Patients with Penile Cancer : A Systematic Review]

Overview
Journal Urologe A
Specialty Urology
Date 2018 Feb 25
PMID 29476193
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Psychological stress of patients with penile cancer arises from the cancer diagnosis itself and the treatment consequences. In addition, there is cancer-specific distress. There is the chance of cure in localized stages and in those with limited regional lymph node metastases but this requires surgery and often adjuvant chemotherapy. This systematic review gives a summary of the existing literature to date.

Materials And Methods: A critical database search using Medline was made in Ovid from 1946 to 2017, in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and in the Web of Science from 1900 to 2017. This was complemented by a search of the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. The reference lists of the included studies were manually searched for additional references.

Results: Selected studies (n = 10) addressed the psychosocial effects of penile cancer treatment on quality of life and sexual function. Due to the heterogeneity of the study designs only a narrative description of the results was possible. Defects or mutilation due to penile cancer cause psychological distress in a significant number of patients. Organ-sparing interventions have a positive impact on quality of life and sexual function.

Conclusion: The external genitals are a focus of sexual identity. Mutilating treatment causes significant distress but organ-sparing treatment and reconstruction positively influence quality of life.

Citing Articles

A SEER database retrospective cohort of 547 patients with penile non-squamous cell carcinoma: demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes.

Ashley L, Sutton K, Ju A, Edwards G, Pasli M, Bhatt A Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1271913.

PMID: 38023122 PMC: 10644775. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1271913.


Quality of life, voiding and sexual function of penile cancer patients: DaPeCa-10-a cross-sectional questionnaire survey.

Jakobsen J, Sorensen C, Krarup K, Jensen J BJUI Compass. 2022; 3(5):354-362.

PMID: 35950041 PMC: 9349586. DOI: 10.1002/bco2.159.


Global Pattern and Trends in Penile Cancer Incidence: Population-Based Study.

Fu L, Tian T, Yao K, Chen X, Luo G, Gao Y JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022; 8(7):e34874.

PMID: 35793140 PMC: 9301560. DOI: 10.2196/34874.


What Is the Most Effective Management of the Primary Tumor in Men with Invasive Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Available Treatment Options and Their Outcomes.

Sakalis V, Campi R, Barreto L, Perdomo H, Greco I, Zapala L Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022; 40:58-94.

PMID: 35540709 PMC: 9079254. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.04.002.


Does the Identification of a Minimum Number of Cases Correlate With Better Adherence to International Guidelines Regarding the Treatment of Penile Cancer? Survey Results of the European PROspective Penile Cancer Study (E-PROPS).

Lebentrau S, Wakileh G, Schostak M, Schmid H, Suarez-Ibarrola R, Merseburger A Front Oncol. 2021; 11:759362.

PMID: 34912711 PMC: 8667688. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.759362.


References
1.
Kieffer J, Djajadiningrat R, van Muilekom E, Graafland N, Horenblas S, Aaronson N . Quality of life for patients treated for penile cancer. J Urol. 2014; 192(4):1105-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.014. View

2.
Gulino G, Sasso F, Falabella R, Bassi P . Distal urethral reconstruction of the glans for penile carcinoma: results of a novel technique at 1-year of followup. J Urol. 2007; 178(3 Pt 1):941-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.059. View

3.
Gulino G, Sasso F, Palermo G, DOnofrio A, Racioppi M, Sacco E . Sexual outcomes after organ potency-sparing surgery and glans reconstruction in patients with penile carcinoma. Indian J Urol. 2013; 29(2):119-23. PMC: 3737667. DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.114033. View

4.
Sansalone S, Silvani M, Leonardi R, Vespasiani G, Iacovelli V . Sexual outcomes after partial penectomy for penile cancer: results from a multi-institutional study. Asian J Androl. 2015; 19(1):57-61. PMC: 5227676. DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.168690. View

5.
Maddineni S, Lau M, Sangar V . Identifying the needs of penile cancer sufferers: a systematic review of the quality of life, psychosexual and psychosocial literature in penile cancer. BMC Urol. 2009; 9:8. PMC: 2731105. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2490-9-8. View