» Articles » PMID: 29474617

Using Big Data from Health Records from Four Countries to Evaluate Chronic Disease Outcomes: a Study in 114 364 Survivors of Myocardial Infarction

Abstract

Aims: To assess the international validity of using hospital record data to compare long-term outcomes in heart attack survivors.

Methods And Results: We used samples of national, ongoing, unselected record sources to assess three outcomes: cause death; a composite of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and all-cause death; and hospitalized bleeding. Patients aged 65 years and older entered the study 1 year following the most recent discharge for acute MI in 2002-11 [n = 54 841 (Sweden), 53 909 (USA), 4653 (England), and 961 (France)]. Across each of the four countries, we found consistent associations with 12 baseline prognostic factors and each of the three outcomes. In each country, we observed high 3-year crude cumulative risks of all-cause death (from 19.6% [England] to 30.2% [USA]); the composite of MI, stroke, or death [from 26.0% (France) to 36.2% (USA)]; and hospitalized bleeding [from 3.1% (France) to 5.3% (USA)]. After adjustments for baseline risk factors, risks were similar across all countries [relative risks (RRs) compared with Sweden not statistically significant], but higher in the USA for all-cause death [RR USA vs. Sweden, 1.14 (95% confidence interval 1.04-1.26)] and hospitalized bleeding [RR USA vs. Sweden, 1.54 (1.21-1.96)].

Conclusion: The validity of using hospital record data is supported by the consistency of estimates across four countries of a high adjusted risk of death, further MI, and stroke in the chronic phase after MI. The possibility that adjusted risks of mortality and bleeding are higher in the USA warrants further study.

Citing Articles

Secondary Prevention after Myocardial Infarction: What to Do and Where to Do It.

Tuka V, Holub J, Belohlavek J Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 23(6):210.

PMID: 39077194 PMC: 11273751. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2306210.


Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy with Low-Dose Rivaroxaban in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Bucci T, Del Sole F, Menichelli D, Galardo G, Biccire F, Farcomeni A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 38610798 PMC: 11012887. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13072033.


Health outcomes after myocardial infarction: A population study of 56 million people in England.

Hall M, Smith L, Wu J, Hayward C, Batty J, Lambert P PLoS Med. 2024; 21(2):e1004343.

PMID: 38358949 PMC: 10868847. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004343.


SGLT2 inhibitor improves the prognosis of patients with coronary heart disease and prevents in-stent restenosis.

Zhang Q, Deng Z, Li T, Chen K, Zeng Z Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 10:1280547.

PMID: 38274313 PMC: 10808651. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1280547.


Cardiovascular disease care and outcomes in West and South European countries.

Timmis A, Kazakiewicz D, Torbica A, Townsend N, Huculeci R, Aboyans V Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023; 33:100718.

PMID: 37953997 PMC: 10636271. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100718.


References
1.
Rapsomaniki E, Shah A, Perel P, Denaxas S, George J, Nicholas O . Prognostic models for stable coronary artery disease based on electronic health record cohort of 102 023 patients. Eur Heart J. 2013; 35(13):844-52. PMC: 3971383. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht533. View

2.
Chung S, Gedeborg R, Nicholas O, James S, Jeppsson A, Wolfe C . Acute myocardial infarction: a comparison of short-term survival in national outcome registries in Sweden and the UK. Lancet. 2014; 383(9925):1305-1312. PMC: 4255068. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62070-X. View

3.
Steg P, James S, Atar D, Badano L, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Borger M . ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33(20):2569-619. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs215. View

4.
Shah A, Langenberg C, Rapsomaniki E, Denaxas S, Pujades-Rodriguez M, Gale C . Type 2 diabetes and incidence of cardiovascular diseases: a cohort study in 1·9 million people. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014; 3(2):105-13. PMC: 4303913. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70219-0. View

5.
Steinberg B, French W, Peterson E, Frederick P, Cannon C . Is coding for myocardial infarction more accurate now that coding descriptions have been clarified to distinguish ST-elevation myocardial infarction from non-ST elevation myocardial infarction?. Am J Cardiol. 2008; 102(5):513-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.04.039. View