» Articles » PMID: 29473290

Estimating Gestational Age at Birth from Fundal Height and Additional Anthropometrics: a Prospective Cohort Study

Overview
Journal BJOG
Date 2018 Feb 24
PMID 29473290
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Accurate assessment of gestational age (GA) is critical to paediatric care, but is limited in developing countries without access to ultrasound. Our objectives were to assess the accuracy of prediction of GA at birth and preterm birth classification using routinely collected anthropometry measures.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: United States.

Population Or Sample: A total of 2334 non-obese and 468 obese pregnant women.

Methods: Enrolment GA was determined based on last menstrual period, confirmed by first-trimester ultrasound. Maternal anthropometry and fundal height (FH) were measured by a standardised protocol at study visits; FH alone was additionally abstracted from medical charts. Neonatal anthropometry measurements were obtained at birth. To estimate GA at delivery, we developed three predictor models using longitudinal FH alone and with maternal and neonatal anthropometry. For all predictors, we repeatedly sampled observations to construct training (60%) and test (40%) sets. Linear mixed models incorporated longitudinal maternal anthropometry and a shared parameter model incorporated neonatal anthropometry. We assessed models' accuracy under varied scenarios.

Main Outcome Measures: Estimated GA at delivery.

Results: Prediction error for various combinations of anthropometric measures ranged between 13.9 and 14.9 days. Longitudinal FH alone predicted GA within 14.9 days with relatively stable prediction errors across individual race/ethnicities [whites (13.9 days), blacks (15.1 days), Hispanics (15.5 days) and Asians (13.1 days)], and correctly identified 75% of preterm births. The model was robust to additional scenarios.

Conclusions: In low-risk, non-obese women, longitudinal FH measures alone can provide a reasonably accurate assessment of GA when ultrasound measures are not available.

Tweetable Abstract: Longitudinal fundal height alone predicts gestational age at birth when ultrasound measures are unavailable.

Citing Articles

Exploring gestational age, and birth weight assessment in Thatta district, Sindh, Pakistan: Healthcare providers' knowledge, practices, perceived barriers, and the potential of a mobile app for identifying preterm and low birth weight.

Tikmani S, Martensson T, Roujani S, Shahil Feroz A, Seyfulayeva A, Martensson A PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0299395.

PMID: 38603767 PMC: 11008874. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299395.


Correcting for measurement error in assessing gestational age in a low-resource setting: a regression calibration approach.

Agogo G, Verani J, Otieno N, Nyawanda B, Widdowson M, Chaves S Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1222772.

PMID: 37901408 PMC: 10613090. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1222772.


Measurement of symphysis fundal height for gestational age estimation in low-to-middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Whelan R, Schaeffer L, Olson I, Folger L, Alam S, Ajaz N PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0272718.

PMID: 36007078 PMC: 9409500. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272718.


Pregnancy Care for Patients With Super Morbid Obesity.

Olerich K, Soper D, Delaney S, Sterrett M Front Pediatr. 2022; 10:839377.

PMID: 35928678 PMC: 9343711. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.839377.


Does prior ultrasonography affect the safety of induced abortion at or after 13 weeks' gestation? A retrospective study.

Kapp N, Griffin R, Bhattarai N, Dangol D Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020; 100(4):736-742.

PMID: 33185906 PMC: 8246849. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14040.


References
1.
Papageorghiou A, Ohuma E, Gravett M, Hirst J, da Silveira M, Lambert A . International standards for symphysis-fundal height based on serial measurements from the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project: prospective cohort study in eight countries. BMJ. 2016; 355:i5662. PMC: 5098415. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i5662. View

2.
White L, Lee S, Stepniewska K, Simpson J, Dwell S, Arunjerdja R . Estimation of gestational age from fundal height: a solution for resource-poor settings. J R Soc Interface. 2011; 9(68):503-10. PMC: 3262426. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0376. View

3.
Belizan J, Villar J, Nardin J, Malamud J, De Vicurna L . Diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation by a simple clinical method: measurement of uterine height. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978; 131(6):643-6. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(78)90824-4. View

4.
Skupski D, Owen J, Kim S, Fuchs K, Albert P, Grantz K . Estimating Gestational Age From Ultrasound Fetal Biometrics. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 130(2):433-441. PMC: 5712287. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002137. View

5.
Johnson T, Engstrom J, Gelhar D . Intra- and interexaminer reliability of anthropometric measurements of term infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1997; 24(5):497-505. DOI: 10.1097/00005176-199705000-00001. View