» Articles » PMID: 29471931

Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Improves Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes and Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Overview
Date 2018 Feb 24
PMID 29471931
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) has been established by large trials; however, these trials largely excluded patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD).

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine whether treatment with PCI or CABG leads to improved outcomes in patients with DM, CAD, and LVD.

Methods: In this propensity-matched study, outcomes were compared for patients with CAD, DM, and LVD treated with PCI or CABG between 2004 and 2016. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, defined as the composite of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization. Secondary outcomes were the individual components of the primary outcome.

Results: PCI compared with CABG was associated with a higher risk for major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in cohorts with ejection fraction (EF) 35% to 49% (p < 0.001) and <35% (p < 0.001). Treatment with PCI was associated with an increased risk for death in both the EF 35% to 49% and the EF <35% cohorts. Stroke rate did not differ between PCI and CABG in either EF cohort. PCI was associated with an increased rate of MI in the EF <35% cohort, and repeat revascularization occurred more frequently in patients treated with PCI in both the EF 35% to 49% cohort and the EF <35% cohort.

Conclusions: At long-term follow-up, patients with CAD, DM, and LVD treated with CABG exhibited a significantly lower incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and better long-term survival over PCI, without a higher risk for stroke.

Citing Articles

High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction deemed not suitable for surgical revascularisation. A clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular....

Schafer A, Alasnag M, Giacoppo D, Collet C, Rudolph T, Roguin A EuroIntervention. 2025; 21(1):22-34.

PMID: 39773827 PMC: 11687390. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-01100.


Association of plasma endothelin-1 levels with revascularization strategies and short-term clinical outcomes: Role of diabetes.

Mayyas F, Ibrahim K, Ibdah R, Al-Kasasbeh A, Ababneh M, Ababneh A Heliyon. 2024; 10(18):e37777.

PMID: 39315138 PMC: 11417160. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37777.


Impact of sex on long-term outcomes following mitral valve repair.

El-Andari R, Bozso S, Kang J, Boe D, Fialka N, Hong Y Am Heart J Plus. 2024; 1:100004.

PMID: 38560361 PMC: 10976287. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2021.100004.


Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting among patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jaiswal V, Ang S, Shrestha A, Joshi A, Ishak A, Chia J Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023; 85(6):2849-2857.

PMID: 37363575 PMC: 10289746. DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000634.


Contemporary Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting vs Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Mehaffey J, Awori Hayanga J, Kawsara M, Sakhuja A, Mascio C, Rankin J Ann Thorac Surg. 2023; 116(6):1213-1220.

PMID: 37353103 PMC: 10739562. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.05.032.