The Combination of Targeted and Systematic Prostate Biopsies is the Best Protocol for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: Compared with standard systematic transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies (SBx), targeted biopsies (TBx) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/TRUS fusion could increase the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa-s) and reduce non-significant PCa (PCa-ns). This study aimed to compare the performance of the two approaches.
Materials And Methods: A prospective, single-center study was conducted on all consecutive patients with PCa suspicion who underwent prebiopsy multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). All patients underwent mpMRI/TRUS fusion TBx (two to four cores/target) using UroStation™ (Koelis, Grenoble, France) and SBx (10-12 cores) during the same session. PCa-s was defined as a maximal positive core length ≥4 mm or Gleason score ≥7.
Results: The study included 191 patients (at least one suspicious lesion: PI-RADS ≥3). PCa was detected in 55.5% (106/191) of the cases. The overall PCa detection rate and the PCa-s detection rate were not significantly higher in TBx alone versus SBx (44.5% vs 46.1%, p = .7, and 38.2% vs 33.5%, p = .2, respectively). Combined TBx and SBx diagnosed significantly more PCa-s than SBx alone (45% vs 33.5%, p = .02). PCa-s was detected only by TBx in 12% of cases (23/191) and only by SBx in 7.3% (14/191). Gleason score was upgraded by TBx in 16.8% (32/191) and by SBx in 13.6% (26/191) of patients (p = .4).
Conclusions: The combination of TBx and SBx achieved the best results for the detection and prognosis of PCa-s. The use of SBx alone would have missed the detection of PCa-s in 12% of patients.
Llewellyn A, Phung T, Soares M, Shepherd L, Glynn D, Harden M Health Technol Assess. 2024; 28(61):1-310.
PMID: 39367754 PMC: 11472214. DOI: 10.3310/PLFG4210.
Do we need MRI in all biopsy naïve patients? A multicenter cohort analysis.
Krausewitz P, Borkowetz A, Ortner G, Kornienko K, Wenzel M, Westhoff N World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):73.
PMID: 38324090 PMC: 10850200. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04780-1.
Morote J, Picola N, Munoz-Rodriguez J, Paesano N, Ruiz-Plazas X, Munoz-Rivero M Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(18).
PMID: 37760511 PMC: 10526349. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184543.
Does experience change the role of systematic biopsy during MRI-fusion biopsy of the prostate?.
Jahnen M, Amiel T, Wagner T, Kirchhoff F, Buchler J, Duwel C World J Urol. 2023; 41(10):2699-2705.
PMID: 37626183 PMC: 10581940. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04564-z.
Mischinger J, Schollnast H, Zurl H, Geyer M, Fischereder K, Adelsmayr G Front Surg. 2022; 9:1013389.
PMID: 36277287 PMC: 9582510. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1013389.