The Relationships Between Doctor-Patient Affectionate Communication and Patient Perceptions and Outcomes
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The current article combines the literature on doctor-patient communication and affectionate communication. Using Affection Exchange Theory (AET), the study predicts that the need for affection and the benefits of affectionate communication translate to the doctor-patient setting, proposing a series of relationships from both perceived doctor affectionate communication and affection deprivation to several patient outcome variables (patient perception of the doctor, patient communication with the doctor, and patient satisfaction/adherence). The results strongly supported the predictions for both affectionate communication and affection deprivation, with affectionate communication positively relating to most outcome measures and affection deprivation negatively relating to most outcome measures. Affection deprivation served as a moderator for the relationship between provider competence and patient satisfaction, although affectionate communication moderated the relationship between provider competence and patient adherence. Implications and possible directions for future research are discussed.
Qian Y, Wang X, Huang X, Li J, Jin C, Chen J Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1296032.
PMID: 38605837 PMC: 11008602. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1296032.
Jiang M, Kong Y BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):387.
PMID: 38321441 PMC: 11318253. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-17813-6.
Value of Care: An Exploratory Qualitative Study with Doctors and Patients.
Marino L, Capone V Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023; 13(7):1117-1129.
PMID: 37504475 PMC: 10378535. DOI: 10.3390/ejihpe13070084.
An analytic hierarchy process analysis for reinforcing doctor-patient communication.
Park S, Kim H, Lee M BMC Prim Care. 2023; 24(1):24.
PMID: 36670353 PMC: 9860231. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-01972-3.
Glassman L, Szymczak J BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):2309.
PMID: 36494647 PMC: 9733306. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14420-1.