» Articles » PMID: 29461067

Perceptual Boundaries Cause Mnemonic Trade-offs Between Local Boundary Processing and Across-trial Associative Binding

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2018 Feb 21
PMID 29461067
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Episodic memories are not veridical records of our lives, but rather are better described as organized summaries of experience. Theories and empirical research suggest that shifts in perceptual, temporal, and semantic information lead to a chunking of our continuous experiences into segments, or "events." However, the consequences of these contextual shifts on memory formation and organization remains unclear. In a series of 3 behavioral studies, we introduced context shifts (or "event boundaries") between trains of stimuli and then examined the influence of the boundaries on several measures of associative memory. In Experiment 1, we found that perceptual event boundaries strengthened associative binding of item-context pairings present at event boundaries. In Experiment 2, we observed reduced temporal order memory for items encoded in distinct events relative to items encoded within the same event, and a trade-off between the speed of processing at boundaries, and temporal order memory for items that flanked those boundaries. Finally, in Experiment 3 we found that event organization imprinted structure on the order in which items were freely recalled. These results provide insight into how boundary- and event-related organizational processes during encoding shape subsequent representations of events in episodic memory. (PsycINFO Database Record

Citing Articles

Rapid context inference in a thalamocortical model using recurrent neural networks.

Zheng W, Wu Z, Hummos A, Yang G, Halassa M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):8275.

PMID: 39333467 PMC: 11436643. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52289-3.


Locus coeruleus activation 'resets' hippocampal event representations and separates adjacent memories.

Clewett D, Huang R, Davachi L bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39185215 PMC: 11343187. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.15.608148.


The Ubiquity of Time in Latent-cause Inference.

Mirea D, Shin Y, DuBrow S, Niv Y J Cogn Neurosci. 2024; 36(11):2442-2454.

PMID: 39136572 PMC: 11493367. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_02231.


Event boundaries drive norepinephrine release and distinctive neural representations of space in the rodent hippocampus.

Mckenzie S, Sommer A, Donaldson T, Pimentel I, Kakani M, Choi I bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39131365 PMC: 11312532. DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.30.605900.


Medial Temporal Lobe Damage Impairs Temporal Integration in Episodic Memory.

DuBrow S, Sherman B, Meager M, Davachi L J Cogn Neurosci. 2024; 36(11):2302-2316.

PMID: 39023365 PMC: 11493366. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_02222.


References
1.
Atkinson R, Shiffrin R . The control of short-term memory. Sci Am. 1971; 225(2):82-90. DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0871-82. View

2.
Fabiani M, Donchin E . Encoding processes and memory organization: a model of the von Restorff effect. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995; 21(1):224-40. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.21.1.224. View

3.
Lin J, Pype A, Murray S, Boynton G . Enhanced memory for scenes presented at behaviorally relevant points in time. PLoS Biol. 2010; 8(3):e1000337. PMC: 2838752. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000337. View

4.
DuBrow S, Davachi L . Temporal memory is shaped by encoding stability and intervening item reactivation. J Neurosci. 2014; 34(42):13998-4005. PMC: 4198540. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2535-14.2014. View

5.
Miller G . The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev. 1956; 63(2):81-97. View