» Articles » PMID: 29459669

Isoniazid Resistance Levels of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Can Largely Be Predicted by High-confidence Resistance-conferring Mutations

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2018 Feb 21
PMID 29459669
Citations 63
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The majority of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates resistant to isoniazid harbour a mutation in katG. Since these mutations cause a wide range of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), largely below the serum level reached with higher dosing (15 mg/L upon 15-20 mg/kg), the drug might still remain partly active in presence of a katG mutation. We therefore investigated which genetic mutations predict the level of phenotypic isoniazid resistance in clinical M. tuberculosis isolates. To this end, the association between known and unknown isoniazid resistance-conferring mutations in whole genome sequences, and the isoniazid MICs of 176 isolates was examined. We found mostly moderate-level resistance characterized by a mode of 6.4 mg/L for the very common katG Ser315Thr mutation, and always very high MICs (≥19.2 mg/L) for the combination of katG Ser315Thr and inhA c-15t. Contrary to common belief, isolates harbouring inhA c-15t alone, partly also showed moderate-level resistance, particularly when combined with inhA Ser94Ala. No overt association between low-confidence or unknown mutations, except in katG, and isoniazid resistance (level) was found. Except for the rare katG deletion, line probe assay is thus not sufficiently accurate to predict the level of isoniazid resistance for a single mutation in katG or inhA.

Citing Articles

Characterization of isoniazid resistance and genetic mutations in isoniazid-resistant and rifampicin-susceptible in China.

Liu D, Zhao B, Zheng Y, Ou X, Wang S, Zhou Y Infect Med (Beijing). 2024; 3(3):100129.

PMID: 39314806 PMC: 11417578. DOI: 10.1016/j.imj.2024.100129.


Multi-drug resistant gene mutation analysis in by molecular techniques.

Sultana M, Alam M, Mistri S, Mostafa Kamal S, Ahsan C, Yasmin M Iran J Microbiol. 2024; 16(4):459-469.

PMID: 39267928 PMC: 11389769. DOI: 10.18502/ijm.v16i4.16304.


Discordance Between Phenotypic and WGS-Based Drug Susceptibility Testing Results for Some Anti-Tuberculosis Drugs: A Snapshot Study of Paired Isolates with Small Genetic Distance.

Sadovska D, Nodieva A, Pole I, Viksna A, kimsis J, Ozere I Infect Drug Resist. 2024; 17:3289-3307.

PMID: 39108991 PMC: 11300831. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S468997.


Evaluation of Whole Genome Sequencing-Based Predictions of Antimicrobial Resistance to TB First Line Agents: A Lesson from 5 Years of Data.

Sharma M, Stobart M, Akochy P, Adam H, Janella D, Rabb M Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(11).

PMID: 38892433 PMC: 11172968. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25116245.


Plant antibacterials: The challenges and opportunities.

Berida T, Adekunle Y, Dada-Adegbola H, Kdimy A, Roy S, Sarker S Heliyon. 2024; 10(10):e31145.

PMID: 38803958 PMC: 11128932. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31145.


References
1.
Alsultan A, Peloquin C . Therapeutic drug monitoring in the treatment of tuberculosis: an update. Drugs. 2014; 74(8):839-54. DOI: 10.1007/s40265-014-0222-8. View

2.
Kambli P, Ajbani K, Sadani M, Nikam C, Shetty A, Udwadia Z . Defining multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: correlating GenoType MTBDRplus assay results with minimum inhibitory concentrations. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015; 82(1):49-53. PMC: 4414878. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.01.009. View

3.
Seifert M, Catanzaro D, Catanzaro A, Rodwell T . Genetic mutations associated with isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2015; 10(3):e0119628. PMC: 4370653. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119628. View

4.
Vincent V, Rigouts L, Nduwamahoro E, Holmes B, Cunningham J, Guillerm M . The TDR Tuberculosis Strain Bank: a resource for basic science, tool development and diagnostic services. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012; 16(1):24-31. DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.11.0223. View

5.
Lewis P . A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Syst Biol. 2002; 50(6):913-25. DOI: 10.1080/106351501753462876. View