» Articles » PMID: 29458714

Fungal Communities Associated with Species of Fraxinus Tolerant to Ash Dieback, and Their Potential for Biological Control

Overview
Journal Fungal Biol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2018 Feb 21
PMID 29458714
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ash dieback, caused by the fungus Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, has threatened ash trees in Europe for more than two decades. However, little is known of how endophytic communities affect the pathogen, and no effective disease management tools are available. While European ash (Fraxinus excelsior) is severely affected by the disease, other more distantly related ash species do not seem to be affected. We hypothesise that fungal endophytic communities of tolerant ash species can protect the species against ash dieback, and that selected endophytes have potential as biocontrol agents. These hypotheses were tested by isolating members of the fungal communities of five tolerant ash species, and identifying them using ITS regions. Candidate endophytes were tested by an in vitro antagonistic assay with H.fraxineus. From a total of 196 isolates we identified 9 fungal orders, 15 families, and 40 species. Fungi in orders Pleosporales, such as Boeremia exigua and Diaporthe spp., and Hypocreales (e.g., Fusarium sp.), were recovered in most communities, suggesting they are common taxa. The in vitro antagonistic assay revealed five species with high antagonistic activity against H. fraxineus. These endophytes were identified based on ITS region as Sclerostagonospora sp., Setomelanomma holmii, Epicoccum nigrum, B. exigua and Fusarium sp. Three of these taxa have been described previously as antagonists of plant pathogenic microbes, and are of interest for future studies of their potential as biological control agents against ash dieback, especially for valuable ash trees in parks and urban areas.

Citing Articles

Strong antagonism of an endophyte of towards the ash dieback pathogen, , is mediated by the antifungal secondary metabolite PF1140.

Demir O, Schulz B, Rabsch L, Steinert M, Surup F Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024; 90(6):e0066524.

PMID: 38814060 PMC: 11218641. DOI: 10.1128/aem.00665-24.


Diversity of Endophytes of in Different Seasons.

Liu Y, Lu W, Li Y, Zhai B, Zhang B, Qin H Life (Basel). 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38276278 PMC: 10819999. DOI: 10.3390/life14010149.


Bioactive Compounds from an Endophytic sp. Showing Antagonistic Effects against the Ash Dieback Pathogen.

Demir O, Zeng H, Schulz B, Schrey H, Steinert M, Stadler M Biomolecules. 2023; 13(11).

PMID: 38002314 PMC: 10669340. DOI: 10.3390/biom13111632.


Beyond the surface: exploring the mycobiome of Norway spruce under drought stress and with Heterobasidion parviporum.

Durodola B, Blumenstein K, Akinbobola A, Kolehmainen A, Chano V, Gailing O BMC Microbiol. 2023; 23(1):350.

PMID: 37978432 PMC: 10655427. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-023-03099-y.


The Good, the Bad, and the Useable Microbes within the Common Alder () Microbiome-Potential Bio-Agents to Combat Alder Dieback.

Fuller E, Germaine K, Singh Rathore D Microorganisms. 2023; 11(9).

PMID: 37764031 PMC: 10535473. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11092187.