» Articles » PMID: 29456843

Analysis of Selected Policies Towards Universal Health Coverage in Uganda: the Policy Implementation Barometer Protocol

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2018 Feb 20
PMID 29456843
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Policy implementation remains an under researched area in most low and middle income countries and it is not surprising that several policies are implemented without a systematic follow up of why and how they are working or failing. This study is part of a larger project called Supporting Policy Engagement for Evidence-based Decisions (SPEED) for Universal Health Coverage in Uganda. It seeks to support policymakers monitor the implementation of vital programmes for the realisation of policy goals for Universal Health Coverage. A Policy Implementation Barometer (PIB) is proposed as a mechanism to provide feedback to the decision makers about the implementation of a selected set of policy programmes at various implementation levels (macro, meso and micro level). The main objective is to establish the extent of implementation of malaria, family planning and emergency obstetric care policies in Uganda and use these results to support stakeholder engagements for corrective action. This is the first PIB survey of the three planned surveys and its specific objectives include: assessment of the perceived appropriateness of implementation programmes to the identified policy problems; determination of enablers and constraints to implementation of the policies; comparison of on-line and face-to-face administration of the PIB questionnaire among target respondents; and documentation of stakeholder responses to PIB findings with regard to corrective actions for implementation.

Methods/design: The PIB will be a descriptive and analytical study employing mixed methods in which both quantitative and qualitative data will be systematically collected and analysed. The first wave will focus on 10 districts and primary data will be collected through interviews. The study seeks to interview 570 respondents of which 120 will be selected at national level with 40 based on each of the three policy domains, 200 from 10 randomly selected districts, and 250 from 50 facilities. Half of the respondents at each level will be randomly assigned to either face-to-face or on-line interviews. An integrated questionnaire for these interviews will collect both quantitative data through Likert scale-type questions, and qualitative data through open-ended questions. And finally focused dialogues will be conducted with selected stakeholders for feedback on the PIB findings. Secondary data will be collected using data extraction tools for performance statistics.

Discussion: It is anticipated that the PIB findings and more importantly, the focused dialogues with relevant stakeholders, that will be convened to discuss the findings and establish corrective actions, will enhance uptake of results and effective health policy implementation towards universal health coverage in Uganda.

Citing Articles

Assessing national medicines policies: a protocol for systematic review of access to medicine assessment metrics and indicators.

Ojo T, Saxena E, Persaud N BMJ Open. 2024; 14(11):e086459.

PMID: 39578023 PMC: 11590839. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086459.


"Sickness has no time": Awareness and perceptions of health care workers on universal health coverage in Uganda.

Ifeagwu S, Nakaboga Kikonyogo R, Nakkazi S, Beinomugisha J, Wandera S, Kiwanuka S PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0306922.

PMID: 39024379 PMC: 11257248. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306922.


Enhancing the Introduction and Scale Up of Self-Administered Injectable Contraception (DMPA-SC) in Health Systems (the EASIER Project): Protocol for Embedded Implementation Research.

Baynes C, Steyn P, Sherr K, Kiarie J JMIR Res Protoc. 2023; 12:e44222.

PMID: 37610819 PMC: 10483301. DOI: 10.2196/44222.


Best Practices in Achieving Universal Health Coverage: A Scoping Review.

Koohpayehzadeh J, Azami-Aghdash S, Derakhshani N, Rezapour A, Alaei Kalajahi R, Sajjadi Khasraghi J Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2022; 35:191.

PMID: 36042832 PMC: 9391760. DOI: 10.47176/mjiri.35.191.


Stakeholder Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators on the Implementation of the 1000 Days Plus Nutrition Policy Activities in Ghana.

Galaurchi A, Chatio S, Beeri P, Oduro A, Ofosu W, Hanson M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(10).

PMID: 34067735 PMC: 8156632. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18105317.


References
1.
Heller P . The prospects of creating 'fiscal space' for the health sector. Health Policy Plan. 2006; 21(2):75-9. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czj013. View

2.
Mutale W, Godfrey-Fausset P, Mwanamwenge M, Kasese N, Chintu N, Balabanova D . Measuring health system strengthening: application of the balanced scorecard approach to rank the baseline performance of three rural districts in Zambia. PLoS One. 2013; 8(3):e58650. PMC: 3605425. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058650. View

3.
Nilsen P, Stahl C, Roback K, Cairney P . Never the twain shall meet?--a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research. Implement Sci. 2013; 8:63. PMC: 3686664. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-63. View

4.
Weir E, dEntremont N, Stalker S, Kurji K, Robinson V . Applying the balanced scorecard to local public health performance measurement: deliberations and decisions. BMC Public Health. 2009; 9:127. PMC: 2684743. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-127. View

5.
Peters D, Noor A, Singh L, Kakar F, Hansen P, Burnham G . A balanced scorecard for health services in Afghanistan. Bull World Health Organ. 2007; 85(2):146-51. PMC: 2636277. DOI: 10.2471/blt.06.033746. View