» Articles » PMID: 29455250

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prevalence of Sarcopenia in Post Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 2018 Feb 19
PMID 29455250
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of reported prevalence of sarcopenia in post acute inpatient rehabilitation.

Methods: Systematic review conducted according to PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration number CRD42016054135). Databases searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Methodology Register, and CINAHL. Studies considered the following: published January 1988-February 2017. Key terms are as follows: "sarcopenia" AND "inpatient rehabilitation" OR "rehabilitation" AND/OR "prevalence". Abstracts and subsequently full studies reporting sarcopenia prevalence in adults admitted to rehabilitation reviewed irrespective of design, provided sarcopenia diagnosis included at least assessment of muscle mass. Random effect meta-analysis was conducted. Methodological quality assessment: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Department of Health and Human Services tool (MORE tool); Joanna Briggs Institute Prevalence Critical Appraisal Tool.

Results: Four hundred twenty-six studies identified during initial search, 399 excluded after reviewing titles and abstracts, 21 full text articles reviewed, and six studies met inclusion criteria. Patient populations: after hip fracture (five studies), general deconditioning (one study). Identified sarcopenia prevalence ranged from 0.28 to 0.69. Pooled sarcopenia prevalence obtained with random effect meta-analysis: 0.56 (95% CI 0.46-0.65), heterogeneity I2 = 92.9%. Main quality shortcomings: lack of reporting of inter- and intra-rater reliability, lack of generalizability to other rehabilitation populations.

Conclusions: Original research examining sarcopenia prevalence in inpatient rehabilitation is scarce. Patient populations studied to date are not representative of general rehabilitation population with regard to both age and admission diagnoses. Sarcopenia may be present in approximately half of rehabilitation patients and its prevalence may vary with admission diagnosis.

Citing Articles

Malnutrition and sarcopenia in inpatient rehabilitation: prevalence and associations with changes in bodyweight, muscle strength, and functional independence.

Lehmann U, Uhlmann K, Meichtry A, Spielmanns M, Spielmanns S, Khatami R J Rehabil Med. 2025; 57:jrm42215.

PMID: 39998491 PMC: 11877858. DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v57.42215.


Comparison of changes in skeletal muscle mass after stroke categorized by the severity of motor dysfunction: a retrospective study.

Odagiri R J Phys Ther Sci. 2025; 37(2):62-66.

PMID: 39902305 PMC: 11787859. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.37.62.


Towards a common definition of hospital-acquired deconditioning in adults: a scoping review.

Westlake M, Cowley A, Robinson K, Gordon A BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e086976.

PMID: 39819903 PMC: 11751929. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086976.


Development and validation of a screening tool for sarcopenia in Chinese nursing home residents.

Sun K, Wu X, Yu J, Chen W, Jia X, Li D iScience. 2024; 27(11):111221.

PMID: 39569363 PMC: 11577178. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111221.


Acute Sarcopenia: Mechanisms and Management.

Damanti S, Senini E, De Lorenzo R, Merolla A, Santoro S, Festorazzi C Nutrients. 2024; 16(20).

PMID: 39458423 PMC: 11510680. DOI: 10.3390/nu16203428.


References
1.
Sanchez-Rodriguez D, Marco E, Miralles R, Fayos M, Mojal S, Alvarado M . Sarcopenia, physical rehabilitation and functional outcomes of patients in a subacute geriatric care unit. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014; 59(1):39-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2014.02.009. View

2.
Dam T, Peters K, Fragala M, Cawthon P, Harris T, McLean R . An evidence-based comparison of operational criteria for the presence of sarcopenia. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014; 69(5):584-90. PMC: 3991139. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glu013. View

3.
Bahat G, Tufan A, Tufan F, Kilic C, Akpinar T, Kose M . Cut-off points to identify sarcopenia according to European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) definition. Clin Nutr. 2016; 35(6):1557-1563. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.02.002. View

4.
Morley J, Abbatecola A, Argiles J, Baracos V, Bauer J, Bhasin S . Sarcopenia with limited mobility: an international consensus. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011; 12(6):403-9. PMC: 5100674. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.04.014. View

5.
Hirschfeld H, Kinsella R, Duque G . Osteosarcopenia: where bone, muscle, and fat collide. Osteoporos Int. 2017; 28(10):2781-2790. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-017-4151-8. View