» Articles » PMID: 29454774

Incremental Diagnostic Value of Stress Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion With Whole-Heart Coverage CT Scanner in Intermediate- to High-Risk Symptomatic Patients Suspected of Coronary Artery Disease

Abstract

Objectives: The goal of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of stress computed tomography myocardial perfusion (CTP) for the detection of functionally significant coronary artery disease (CAD) by using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) plus invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the reference standard in consecutive intermediate- to high-risk symptomatic patients.

Background: Stress CTP recently emerged as a potential strategy to combine the anatomic and functional evaluation of CAD in a single scan.

Methods: A total of 100 consecutive symptomatic patients scheduled for ICA were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent rest coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) followed by stress static CTP with a whole-heart coverage CT scanner (Revolution CT, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin). Diagnostic accuracy and overall effective dose were assessed and compared versus those of ICA and invasive FFR.

Results: The prevalence of obstructive CAD and functionally significant CAD were 69% and 44%, respectively. Coronary CTA alone demonstrated a per-vessel and per-patient sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy of 98%, 76%, 99%, 63%, and 83% and of 98%, 54%, 96%, 68%, and 76%, respectively. Combining coronary CTA with stress CTP, per-vessel and per-patient sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy were 91%, 94%, 96%, 86%, and 93% and 98%, 83%, 98%, 86%, and 91%, with a significant improvement in specificity, positive predictive value, and accuracy in both models. The mean effective dose for coronary CTA and stress CTP were 2.8 ± 1.4 mSv and 2.5 ± 1.1 mSv.

Conclusions: The inclusion of stress CTP for the evaluation of patients with an intermediate to high risk for CAD is feasible and improved the diagnostic performance of coronary CTA for detecting functionally significant CAD.

Citing Articles

How to perform and evaluate a myocardial perfusion imaging by computed tomography.

Mushtaq S, Baggiano A, Cannata F, Del Torto A, Fazzari F, Fusini L Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2025; 3(1):qyaf001.

PMID: 39840236 PMC: 11745902. DOI: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf001.


State of the art of CT myocardial perfusion.

Muscogiuri G, Palumbo P, Kitagawa K, Nakamura S, Senatieri A, De Cecco C Radiol Med. 2024; 130(3):438-452.

PMID: 39704963 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01942-4.


Advancements in Cardiac CT Imaging: The Era of Artificial Intelligence.

Costantini P, Groenhoff L, Ostillio E, Coraducci F, Secchi F, Carriero A Echocardiography. 2024; 41(12):e70042.

PMID: 39584228 PMC: 11586826. DOI: 10.1111/echo.70042.


Noninvasive Coronary Physiological Assessment Derived From Computed Tomography.

Yang S, Koo B J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024; 3(3Part B):101304.

PMID: 39131222 PMC: 11308392. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101304.


Diagnostic efficacy of absolute and relative myocardial blood flow of stress dynamic CT myocardial perfusion for detecting myocardial ischemia in patients with hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.

Kong W, Long B, Huang H, Li F, He Y, Chen X Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1398635.

PMID: 39070553 PMC: 11275098. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1398635.