» Articles » PMID: 29454327

Peer Support to Improve Diabetes Care: an Implementation Evaluation of the Australasian Peers for Progress Diabetes Program

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2018 Feb 19
PMID 29454327
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Several studies have now demonstrated the benefits of peer support in promoting diabetes control. The aim of this study is to evaluate the implementation of a cluster randomised controlled trial of a group-based, peer support program to improve diabetes self-management and thereby, diabetes control in people with Type 2 Diabetes in Victoria, Australia.

Methods: The intervention program was designed to address four key peer support functions i.e. 1) assistance in daily management, 2) social and emotional support, 3) regular linkage to clinical care, and 4) ongoing and sustained support to assist with the lifelong needs of diabetes self-care management. The intervention participants attended monthly group meetings facilitated by a trained peer leader for 12 months. Data was collected on the intervention's reach, participation, implementation fidelity, groups' effectiveness and participants' perceived support and satisfaction with the intervention. The RE-AIM and PIPE frameworks were used to guide this evaluation.

Results: The trial reached a high proportion (79%) of its target population through mailed invitations. Out of a total of 441 eligible individuals, 273 (61.9%) were willing to participate. The intervention fidelity was high (92.7%). The proportion of successful participants who demonstrated a reduction in 5 years cardiovascular disease risk score was 65.1 and 44.8% in the intervention and control arm respectively. Ninety-four percent (94%) of the intervention participants stated that the program helped them manage their diabetes on a day to day basis. Overall, attending monthly group meetings provided 'a lot of support' to 57% and 'moderate' support to 34% of the participants.

Conclusion: Peer support programs are feasible, acceptable and can be used to supplement treatment for patients motivated to improve behaviours related to diabetes. However, program planners need to focus on the participation component in designing future programs. The use of two evaluation frameworks allowed a comprehensive evaluation of the trial from the provider-, participant- and public health perspective. The learnings gained from this evaluation will guide and improve future implementation by improving program feasibility for adoption and acceptability among participants, and will ultimately increase the likelihood of program effectiveness for the participants.

Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12609000469213 . Registered 16 June 2009.

Citing Articles

Challenges and support factors in managing type 2 diabetes among pregnant women in Thailand: A convergent mixed-methods study.

Phonyiam R, Teng C, Sullivan C, Palmquist A, Hodges E, Cortes Y Belitung Nurs J. 2025; 11(1):35-47.

PMID: 39877213 PMC: 11770266. DOI: 10.33546/bnj.3639.


Understanding Patient Registries for Diabetes: A Scoping Review of Published Literature.

Moayad L, Alliston P, Khalid S, Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Gerstein H, Sherifali D J Patient Exp. 2025; 12():23743735251314620.

PMID: 39839486 PMC: 11748152. DOI: 10.1177/23743735251314620.


Factors associated with disease knowledge and attitude among ambulatory patients with type 2 diabetes - a multicenter study.

Aje A, Fakeye T BMC Endocr Disord. 2024; 24(1):158.

PMID: 39187848 PMC: 11345965. DOI: 10.1186/s12902-024-01696-0.


Education programmes for people with chronic kidney disease and diabetes.

Cashmore B, Cooper T, Evangelidis N, Green S, Lopez-Vargas P, Tunnicliffe D Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 8:CD007374.

PMID: 39171639 PMC: 11339929. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007374.pub3.


Evaluation of a specialist nurse-led structured self-management training for peer supporters with type 2 diabetes mellitus with or without comorbid hypertension in Slovenia.

Virtic Potocnik T, Mihevc M, Zavrnik C, Lukancic M, Ruzic Gorenjec N, Susic A BMC Nurs. 2024; 23(1):567.

PMID: 39148069 PMC: 11328385. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-02239-7.


References
1.
Murray C, Barber R, Foreman K, Abbasoglu Ozgoren A, Abd-Allah F, Abera S . Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990-2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition. Lancet. 2015; 386(10009):2145-91. PMC: 4673910. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X. View

2.
Harkins C, Shaw R, Gillies M, Sloan H, Macintyre K, Scoular A . Overcoming barriers to engaging socio-economically disadvantaged populations in CHD primary prevention: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2010; 10:391. PMC: 2906468. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-391. View

3.
Chan J, Sui Y, Oldenburg B, Zhang Y, Chung H, Goggins W . Effects of telephone-based peer support in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving integrated care: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2014; 174(6):972-81. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.655. View

4.
Riddell M, Renwick C, Wolfe R, Colgan S, Dunbar J, Hagger V . Cluster randomized controlled trial of a peer support program for people with diabetes: study protocol for the Australasian Peers for Progress study. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12:843. PMC: 3519788. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-843. View

5.
Tang T, Funnell M, Sinco B, Piatt G, Palmisano G, Spencer M . Comparative effectiveness of peer leaders and community health workers in diabetes self-management support: results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2014; 37(6):1525-34. PMC: 4030090. DOI: 10.2337/dc13-2161. View