» Articles » PMID: 29451905

Otoacoustic Emissions from Ears with Spontaneous Activity Behave Differently to Those Without: Stronger Responses to Tone Bursts As Well As to Clicks

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Feb 17
PMID 29451905
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It has been reported that both click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) have higher amplitudes in ears that possess spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs). The general aim of the present study was to investigate whether the presence of spontaneous activity in the cochlea affected tone-burst evoked otoacoustic emissions (TBOAEs). As a benchmark, the study also measured growth functions of CEOAEs. Spontaneous activity in the cochlea was measured by the level of synchronized spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SSOAEs), an emission evoked by a click but closely related to spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs, which are detectable without any stimulus). Measurements were made on a group of 15 adults whose ears were categorized as either having recordable SSOAEs or no SSOAEs. In each ear, CEOAEs and TBOAEs were registered at frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz, and input/output functions were measured at 40, 50, 60, 70, and 80 dB SPL. Global and half-octave-band values of response level and latency were estimated. Our main finding was that in ears with spontaneous activity, TBOAEs had higher levels than in ears without. The difference was more apparent for global values, but were also seen with half-octave-band analysis. Input/output functions had similar growth rates for ears with and without SSOAEs. There were no significant differences in latencies between TBOAEs from ears with and without SSOAEs, although latencies tended to be longer for lower stimulus levels and lower stimulus frequencies. When TBOAE levels were compared to CEOAE levels, the latter showed greater differences between recordings from ears with and without SSOAEs. Although TBOAEs reflect activity from a more restricted cochlear region than CEOAEs, at all stimulus frequencies their behavior still depends on whether SSOAEs are present or not.

Citing Articles

Fluctuations of Otoacoustic Emissions and Medial Olivocochlear Reflexes: Tracking One Subject over a Year.

Pastucha M, Jedrzejczak W Audiol Res. 2022; 12(5):508-517.

PMID: 36136858 PMC: 9498582. DOI: 10.3390/audiolres12050051.


The Reliability of Contralateral Suppression of Otoacoustic Emissions Is Greater in Women than in Men.

Jedrzejczak W, Pilka E, Pastucha M, Kochanek K, Skarzynski H Audiol Res. 2022; 12(1):79-86.

PMID: 35200258 PMC: 8869615. DOI: 10.3390/audiolres12010008.

References
1.
Killan E, Lutman M, Thyer N . Simultaneous suppression of tone burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions: Two and three-tone burst combinations. Hear Res. 2015; 327:28-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.04.013. View

2.
Prieve B, Gorga M, Schmidt A, Neely S, Peters J, Schultes L . Analysis of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993; 93(6):3308-19. DOI: 10.1121/1.405715. View

3.
Prieve B, Gorga M, Neely S . Click- and tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996; 99(5):3077-86. DOI: 10.1121/1.414794. View

4.
Kulekci Ugur A, Kemaloglu Y, Ugur M, Gunduz B, Saridogan C, Yesilkaya E . Otoacoustic emissions and effects of contralateral white noise stimulation on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in diabetic children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009; 73(4):555-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.12.002. View

5.
Jedrzejczak W, Konopka W, Kochanek K, Skarzynski H . Otoacoustic emissions in newborns evoked by 0.5kHz tone bursts. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015; 79(9):1522-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.07.001. View