» Articles » PMID: 29450852

Major Pancreatic Resections: Normal Postoperative Findings and Complications

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Radiology
Date 2018 Feb 17
PMID 29450852
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: (1) To illustrate and describe the main types of pancreatic surgery; (2) to discuss the normal findings after pancreatic surgery; (3) to review the main complications and their radiological findings.

Background: Despite the decreased postoperative mortality, morbidity still remains high resulting in longer hospitalisations and greater costs. Imaging findings following major pancreatic resections can be broadly divided into "normal postoperative alterations" and real complications. The former should regress within a few months whereas complications may be life-threatening and should be promptly identified and treated.

Imaging Findings: CT is the most effective postoperative imaging technique. MRI and fluoroscopy are used less often and only in specific cases such as assessing the gastro-intestinal function or the biliary tree. The most common normal postoperative findings are pneumobilia, perivascular cuffing, fluid collections, lymphadenopathy, acute anastomotic oedema and stranding of the peri-pancreatic/mesenteric fat. Imaging depicts the anastomoses and the new postoperative anatomy. It can also demonstrate early and late complications: pancreatic fistula, haemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying, hepatic infarction, acute pancreatitis of the remnant, porto-mesenteric thrombosis, abscess, biliary anastomotic leaks, anastomotic stenosis and local recurrence.

Conclusions: Radiologists should be aware of surgical procedures, postoperative anatomy and normal postoperative imaging findings to better detect complications and recurrent disease.

Teaching Points: • Morbidity after pancreatic resections is high. • CT is the most effective postoperative imaging technique. • Imaging depicts the anastomoses and the new postoperative anatomy. • Pancreatic fistula is the most common complication after partial pancreatic resection.

Citing Articles

Cross-sectional imaging of pancreatic leak: a pictorial review.

Cardoso D, Miranda J, de Arimateia Batista Araujo-Filho J, Soares L, Chagas L, Seidel K Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 49(12):4507-4520.

PMID: 38900317 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04401-w.


Novel Insights into Postoperative Surveillance in Resected Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms-A Review.

Balaban D, Coman L, Balaban M, Costache R, Jinga M Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 38786354 PMC: 11119521. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14101056.


Cross-sectional imaging after pancreatic surgery: The dialogue between the radiologist and the surgeon.

Maino C, Cereda M, Franco P, Boraschi P, Cannella R, Gianotti L Eur J Radiol Open. 2024; 12:100544.

PMID: 38304573 PMC: 10831502. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100544.


Identifying Effective Biomarkers for Accurate Pancreatic Cancer Prognosis Using Statistical Machine Learning.

Abu-Khudir R, Hafsa N, Badr B Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(19).

PMID: 37835833 PMC: 10572229. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13193091.


Management of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula-related fluid collections after distal pancreatectomy.

Guarneri G, Guazzarotti G, Pecorelli N, Palumbo D, Palucci M, Provinciali L Surg Endosc. 2022; 37(7):5623-5634.

PMID: 36357548 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09713-w.


References
1.
Diener M, Fitzmaurice C, Schwarzer G, Seiler C, Huttner F, Antes G . Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (11):CD006053. PMC: 4356182. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006053.pub5. View

2.
Gaujoux S, Sauvanet A, Vullierme M, Cortes A, Dokmak S, Sibert A . Ischemic complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, prevention, and management. Ann Surg. 2008; 249(1):111-7. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181930249. View

3.
De Cecco C, Boll D, Bolus D, Foley W, Kaza R, Morgan D . White Paper of the Society of Computed Body Tomography and Magnetic Resonance on Dual-Energy CT, Part 4: Abdominal and Pelvic Applications. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2016; 41(1):8-14. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000546. View

4.
Christein J, Kim A, Golshan M, Maxhimer J, Deziel D, Prinz R . Central pancreatectomy for the resection of benign or low malignant potential neoplasms. World J Surg. 2003; 27(5):595-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-003-6848-4. View

5.
Sica G, Ji H, Ros P . CT and MR imaging of hepatic metastases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 174(3):691-8. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.174.3.1740691. View