Conducting Multicenter Research in Healthcare Simulation: Lessons Learned from the INSPIRE Network
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Simulation-based research has grown substantially over the past two decades; however, relatively few published simulation studies are multicenter in nature. Multicenter research confers many distinct advantages over single-center studies, including larger sample sizes for more generalizable findings, sharing resources amongst collaborative sites, and promoting networking. Well-executed multicenter studies are more likely to improve provider performance and/or have a positive impact on patient outcomes. In this manuscript, we offer a step-by-step guide to conducting multicenter, simulation-based research based upon our collective experience with the International Network for Simulation-based Pediatric Innovation, Research and Education (INSPIRE). Like multicenter clinical research, simulation-based multicenter research can be divided into four distinct phases. Each phase has specific differences when applied to simulation research: (1) , to define the research question, systematically review the literature, identify outcome measures, and conduct pilot studies to ensure feasibility and estimate power; (2) , when the primary investigator identifies collaborators, develops the protocol and research operations manual, prepares grant applications, obtains ethical approval and executes subsite contracts, registers the study in a clinical trial registry, forms a manuscript oversight committee, and conducts feasibility testing and data validation at each site; (3) , involving recruitment and enrollment of subjects, clear communication and decision-making, quality assurance measures and data abstraction, validation, and analysis; and (4) , where the research team shares results via conference presentations, publications, traditional media, social media, and implements strategies for translating results to practice. With this manuscript, we provide a guide to conducting quantitative multicenter research with a focus on simulation-specific issues.
Jeong Y, Lee S, Shim S, Jang K, Kim J Medicine (Baltimore). 2025; 103(52):e41130.
PMID: 39969290 PMC: 11688016. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041130.
Mazinu M, Gwebushe N, Manda S, Reddy T BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025; 25(1):3.
PMID: 39773382 PMC: 11707912. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02441-w.
Nouh M, Ezz Eldin O Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; .
PMID: 39725735 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04786-8.
Pouwels S, Thaher O, Vladimirov M, Felsenreich D, Pascotto B, Taha S BMC Surg. 2024; 24(1):367.
PMID: 39563353 PMC: 11577625. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02636-4.
The impact of surgical simulation and training technologies on general surgery education.
Shahrezaei A, Sohani M, Taherkhani S, Zarghami S BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):1297.
PMID: 39538209 PMC: 11558898. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06299-w.