An Experimental Study on the Impact of Clinical Interruptions on Simulated Trainee Performances of Central Venous Catheterization
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Interruptions are common in the healthcare setting. This experimental study compares the effects of interruptions on simulated performances of central venous catheterization during a highly versus minimally complex portion of the task.
Methods: Twenty-six residents were assigned to interruptions during tasks that are (1) highly complex: establishing ultrasound-guided venous access (experimental group, = 15) or (2) minimally complex: skin cleansing (control group, = 11). Primary outcomes were (a) performance scores at three time points measured with a validated checklist, (b) time spent on the respective tasks, and (c) number of attempts to establish venous access.
Results: Repeated measure analyses of variances of performance scores over time indicated no main effect of time or group. The interaction between time and group was significant: (2, 44) = 4.28, = 0.02, and partial eta = 0.16, indicating a large effect size. The experimental group scores decreased steadily over time, while the control group scores increased with time. The experimental group required longer to access the vein (148 s; interquartile range (IQR) 60 to 361 vs. 44 s; IQR 27 to 133 s; = 0.034). Median number of attempts to establish venous access was higher in the experimental group (2, IQR 1-7 vs. 1, IQR 1-2; = 0.03).
Conclusions: Interruptions during a highly complex task resulted in a consistent decrement in performance scores, longer time required to perform the task, and a higher number of venous access attempts than interruptions during a minimally complex tasks. We recommend avoiding interrupting trainees performing bedside procedures.
Ablordeppey E, Koenig A, Barker A, Hernandez E, Simkovich S, Krings J West J Emerg Med. 2022; 23(5):760-768.
PMID: 36205669 PMC: 9541994. DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2022.7.56501.
Using clinical simulation to study how to improve quality and safety in healthcare.
Lame G, Dixon-Woods M BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020; 6(2):87-94.
PMID: 32133154 PMC: 7056349. DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000370.
Elfering A, Kottwitz M, Hafliger E, Celik Z, Grebner S Saf Health Work. 2018; 9(4):434-440.
PMID: 30559992 PMC: 6284161. DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2018.02.001.
Westbrook J, Raban M, Walter S, Douglas H BMJ Qual Saf. 2018; 27(8):655-663.
PMID: 29317463 PMC: 6204927. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007333.