Associations Between Modifiable Lifestyle Factors and Multidimensional Cognitive Health Among Community-dwelling Old Adults: Stratified by Educational Level
Overview
Psychiatry
Authors
Affiliations
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 3,230 older adults aged 60+ years in Xiamen, China, in 2016. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was used to measure general cognition and six specific sub-domains. To account for educational effects, we adjusted the MoCA score and divided respondents into three education-specific groups (low, moderate, and high education groups with ≤5, 6~8, and ≥9 years of education, respectively). A series of proportional odds models were used to detect the associations between two categories of lifestyle factors - substance abuse (cigarette and alcohol) and leisure activity (TV watching, reading, smartphone use, social activity, and exercise) - and general cognition and the six sub-domains in those three groups.
Results: Among the 3,230 respondents, 2,617 eligible participants were included with a mean age of 69.05 ± 7.07 years. Previous or current smoking/drinking was not associated with MoCA scores in the whole population, but unexpectedly, the ex-smokers in the low education group performed better in general cognition (OR = 2.22) and attention (OR = 2.05) than their never-smoking counterparts. Modest TV watching, reading, and smartphone use also contributed to better cognition among elderly participants in the low education group. For the highly educated elderly, comparatively longer reading (>3.5 hours/week) was inversely associated with general cognition (OR = 0.53), memory (OR = 0.59), and language (OR = 0.54), while adequate exercise (5~7 days/week) was positively related to these factors with OR = 1.48, OR = 1.49, and OR = 1.53, respectively. For the moderately educated elderly, only modest reading was significantly beneficial.
Conclusions: Lifestyle factors play different roles in multidimensional cognitive health in different educational groups, indicating that individual intervention strategies should be designed according to specific educational groups and different cognitive sub-domains.
Xie X, Lyu Y, Wu F, Zong A, Zhuang Z, Xu A Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1426723.
PMID: 39421814 PMC: 11484626. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1426723.
Ma X, Huang W, Lu L, Li H, Ding J, Sheng S Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1195570.
PMID: 37662105 PMC: 10470068. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1195570.
Miyashita N, Ishida T, Ikemoto T, Hirasawa A, Arai Y, Deie M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(23).
PMID: 36498286 PMC: 9740740. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192316213.
Wang L, Ren J, Chen J, Gao R, Bai B, An H Front Public Health. 2022; 10:1000953.
PMID: 36388355 PMC: 9643852. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1000953.
Requena-Ocana N, Araos P, Flores M, Garcia-Marchena N, Silva-Pena D, Aranda J Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):15583.
PMID: 34341419 PMC: 8328971. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95131-2.