» Articles » PMID: 29439375

Burnout and Work-related Stress in Italian Rehabilitation Professionals: A Comparison of Physiotherapists, Speech Therapists and Occupational Therapists

Overview
Journal Work
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2018 Feb 15
PMID 29439375
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Healthcare workers are exposed to work related stresses that significantly increase their risk of burnout.

Objective: To evaluate and compare burnout and work related stress levels in three categories of health professionals: physiotherapists, speech therapists and occupational therapists.

Methods: A convenience sample of 391 health professionals participated, including 210 physiotherapists, 101 speech therapists and 80 occupational therapists. We collected general socio-demographic information and administered the standardized Italian version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) Management Standards Indicator Tool.

Results: We found the proportion of professionals with high-risk scores in the three dimensions of the MBI to be as follows: Emotional Exhaustion 32%, Depersonalisation 13% and Personal Accomplishment 9%. Overall, 14% of participants were at high risk of burnout. No significant differences were found between the three professional categories. Five subscales of the HSE were associated with burnout: Control (p < 0.01), Management support (p < 0.01), Relationship (p < 0.05), Role (p < 0.01), and Change (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Like all health care workers, rehabilitation professionals are at a high risk of burnout. There are common mechanisms underlying burnout in the different professional groups investigated. Further research in occupational health in rehabilitation settings is needed to prevent burnout.

Citing Articles

Burnout and occupational stress of home care rehabilitation professionals transitioning out of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada.

Nowrouzi-Kia B, King E, Edwards B, Nizzer S, Yazdani A, Gohar B Br J Occup Ther. 2024; 87(12):772-782.

PMID: 39628905 PMC: 11609034. DOI: 10.1177/03080226241269251.


Are Healthcare Organizations Healthy Work Ecosystems? Health and Well-Being of Health Professionals.

Gaspar T, Sousa B, Alves E, Coelho A Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(22).

PMID: 39595474 PMC: 11594083. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12222277.


Validation of the Work-Related Quality of Life Scale in Rehabilitation Health Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Ruotolo I, Sellitto G, Berardi A, Panuccio F, Simeon R, DAgostino F Med Lav. 2024; 115(4):e2024025.

PMID: 39189375 PMC: 11424090. DOI: 10.23749/mdl.v115i4.15644.


Comparing the effectiveness of mind-body practices (MBPs) and various psychological methods on occupational stress among healthcare workers: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Zhang Y, Sun J, Wu C, Fei Y, Hu W, Lang H BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):962.

PMID: 39169332 PMC: 11337641. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11437-7.


The effects of occupational and mental stress among home care rehabilitation professionals working during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory qualitative study.

Howe A, Jules K, Tan J, Khan R, Li A, Edwards B Home Health Care Manag Pract. 2024; 36(3):230-242.

PMID: 39149713 PMC: 11321947. DOI: 10.1177/10848223231225246.