Dual-Energy CT in Hemorrhagic Progression of Cerebral Contusion: Overestimation of Hematoma Volumes on Standard 120-kV Images and Rectification with Virtual High-Energy Monochromatic Images After Contrast-Enhanced Whole-Body Imaging
Overview
Affiliations
Background And Purpose: In patients with hemorrhagic contusions, hematoma volumes are overestimated on follow-up standard 120-kV images obtained after contrast-enhanced whole-body CT. We aimed to retrospectively determine hemorrhagic progression of contusion rates on 120-kV and 190-keV images derived from dual-energy CT and the magnitude of hematoma volume overestimation.
Materials And Methods: We retrospectively analyzed admission and follow-up CT studies in 40 patients with hemorrhagic contusions. After annotating the contusions, we measured volumes from admission and follow-up 120-kV and 190-keV images using semiautomated 3D segmentation. Bland-Altman analysis was used for hematoma volume comparison.
Results: On 120-kV images, hemorrhagic progression of contusions was detected in 24 of the 40 patients, while only 17 patients had hemorrhagic progression of contusions on 190-keV images ( = .008). Hematoma volumes were systematically overestimated on follow-up 120-kV images (9.68 versus 8 mm; mean difference, 1.68 mm; standard error, 0.37; < .001) compared with 190-keV images. There was no significant difference in volumes between admission 120-kV and 190-keV images. Mean and median percentages of overestimation were 29% (95% CI, 18-39) and 22% (quartile 3 - quartile 1 = 36.8), respectively.
Conclusions: The 120-kV images, which are comparable with single-energy CT images, significantly overestimated the hematoma volumes, hence the rate of hemorrhagic progression of contusions, after contrast-enhanced whole-body CT. Hence, follow-up of hemorrhagic contusions should be performed on dual-energy CT, and 190-keV images should be used for the assessment of hematoma volumes.
Dual-energy CT arthrography: a feasibility study.
Sandhu R, Aslan M, Obuchowski N, Primak A, Karim W, Subhas N Skeletal Radiol. 2020; 50(4):693-703.
PMID: 32948903 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-020-03603-9.
Dual energy CT in clinical routine: how it works and how it adds value.
Sodickson A, Keraliya A, Czakowski B, Primak A, Wortman J, Uyeda J Emerg Radiol. 2020; 28(1):103-117.
PMID: 32483665 DOI: 10.1007/s10140-020-01785-2.
Adatia K, Newcombe V, Menon D Neurocrit Care. 2020; 34(1):312-324.
PMID: 32462411 PMC: 7253145. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-020-00994-4.
Bodanapally U, Shanmuganathan K, Parikh G, Schwartzbauer G, Kondaveti R, Feiter T AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019; 40(12):2059-2065.
PMID: 31727752 PMC: 6975368. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6316.
Bodanapally U, Shanmuganathan K, Ramaswamy M, Tsymbalyuk S, Aarabi B, Parikh G Radiology. 2019; 292(3):730-738.
PMID: 31361206 PMC: 7705608. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019190078.