» Articles » PMID: 29438568

Haemodynamic Assessment and Support in Sepsis and Septic Shock in Resource-limited Settings

Overview
Date 2018 Feb 14
PMID 29438568
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Recommendations for haemodynamic assessment and support in sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings are largely lacking.

Methods: A task force of six international experts in critical care medicine, all of them members of the Global Intensive Care Working Group of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and with extensive bedside experience in resource-limited intensive care units, reviewed the literature and provided recommendations regarding haemodynamic assessment and support, keeping aspects of efficacy and effectiveness, availability and feasibility and affordability and safety in mind.

Results: We suggest using capillary refill time, skin mottling scores and skin temperature gradients; suggest a passive leg raise test to guide fluid resuscitation; recommend crystalloid solutions as the initial fluid of choice; recommend initial fluid resuscitation with 30 ml/kg in the first 3 h, but with extreme caution in settings where there is a lack of mechanical ventilation; recommend against an early start of vasopressors; suggest starting a vasopressor in patients with persistent hypotension after initial fluid resuscitation with at least 30 ml/kg, but earlier when there is lack of vasopressors and mechanical ventilation; recommend using norepinephrine (noradrenaline) as a first-line vasopressor; suggest starting an inotrope with persistence of plasma lactate >2 mmol/L or persistence of skin mottling or prolonged capillary refill time when plasma lactate cannot be measured, and only after initial fluid resuscitation; suggest the use of dobutamine as a first-line inotrope; recommend administering vasopressors through a central venous line and suggest administering vasopressors and inotropes via a central venous line using a syringe or infusion pump when available.

Conclusion: Recommendations for haemodynamic assessment and support in sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings have been developed by a task force of six international experts in critical care medicine with extensive practical experience in resource-limited settings.

Citing Articles

Epidemiology and outcomes of critically ill patients in the emergency department of a tertiary teaching hospital in Rwanda.

Kamunga B L, Bearnot C, Martin K, Uwamahoro D, Cattermole G Int J Emerg Med. 2024; 17(1):170.

PMID: 39501149 PMC: 11536832. DOI: 10.1186/s12245-024-00736-9.


Capillary Refill Time as a Part of Routine Physical Examination in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Vasoactive Therapy: A Prospective Study.

Wesolek F, Putowski Z, Staniszewska W, Latacz R, Krzych L J Clin Med. 2024; 13(19).

PMID: 39407842 PMC: 11476923. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13195782.


Circulatory shock in adults in emergency department.

Pannu A Turk J Emerg Med. 2023; 23(3):139-148.

PMID: 37529784 PMC: 10389095. DOI: 10.4103/2452-2473.367400.


N-methyladenosine (mA) methyltransferase METTL3 regulates sepsis-induced myocardial injury through IGF2BP1/HDAC4 dependent manner.

Shen H, Xie K, Li M, Yang Q, Wang X Cell Death Discov. 2022; 8(1):322.

PMID: 35840562 PMC: 9287338. DOI: 10.1038/s41420-022-01099-x.


Utilisation of peripheral vasopressor medications and extravasation events among critically ill patients in Rwanda: A prospective cohort study.

Marques C, Mwemerashyaka L, Martin K, Tang O, Uwamahoro C, Ndebwanimana V Afr J Emerg Med. 2022; 12(2):154-159.

PMID: 35505668 PMC: 9046616. DOI: 10.1016/j.afjem.2022.03.006.


References
1.
Serpa Neto A, Schultz M, Festic E . Ventilatory support of patients with sepsis or septic shock in resource-limited settings. Intensive Care Med. 2015; 42(1):100-3. PMC: 4751193. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-015-4070-0. View

2.
Schultz M, Dunser M, Dondorp A, Adhikari N, Iyer S, Kwizera A . Current challenges in the management of sepsis in ICUs in resource-poor settings and suggestions for the future. Intensive Care Med. 2017; 43(5):612-624. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-017-4750-z. View

3.
Ait-Oufella H, Bige N, Boelle P, Pichereau C, Alves M, Bertinchamp R . Capillary refill time exploration during septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2014; 40(7):958-64. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-014-3326-4. View

4.
Dung N, Day N, Tam D, Loan H, Chau H, Minh L . Fluid replacement in dengue shock syndrome: a randomized, double-blind comparison of four intravenous-fluid regimens. Clin Infect Dis. 1999; 29(4):787-94. DOI: 10.1086/520435. View

5.
Hernandez G, Pedreros C, Veas E, Bruhn A, Romero C, Rovegno M . Evolution of peripheral vs metabolic perfusion parameters during septic shock resuscitation. A clinical-physiologic study. J Crit Care. 2011; 27(3):283-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.05.024. View