» Articles » PMID: 29437152

Focused Ultrasound Transducer Spatial Peak Intensity Estimation: a Comparison of Methods

Overview
Journal Phys Med Biol
Publisher IOP Publishing
Date 2018 Feb 14
PMID 29437152
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Characterisation of the spatial peak intensity at the focus of high intensity focused ultrasound transducers is difficult because of the risk of damage to hydrophone sensors at the high focal pressures generated. Hill et al (1994 Ultrasound Med. Biol. 20 259-69) provided a simple equation for estimating spatial-peak intensity for solid spherical bowl transducers using measured acoustic power and focal beamwidth. This paper demonstrates theoretically and experimentally that this expression is only strictly valid for spherical bowl transducers without a central (imaging) aperture. A hole in the centre of the transducer results in over-estimation of the peak intensity. Improved strategies for determining focal peak intensity from a measurement of total acoustic power are proposed. Four methods are compared: (i) a solid spherical bowl approximation (after Hill et al 1994 Ultrasound Med. Biol. 20 259-69), (ii) a numerical method derived from theory, (iii) a method using measured sidelobe to focal peak pressure ratio, and (iv) a method for measuring the focal power fraction (FPF) experimentally. Spatial-peak intensities were estimated for 8 transducers at three drive powers levels: low (approximately 1 W), moderate (~10 W) and high (20-70 W). The calculated intensities were compared with those derived from focal peak pressure measurements made using a calibrated hydrophone. The FPF measurement method was found to provide focal peak intensity estimates that agreed most closely (within 15%) with the hydrophone measurements, followed by the pressure ratio method (within 20%). The numerical method was found to consistently over-estimate focal peak intensity (+40% on average), however, for transducers with a central hole it was more accurate than using the solid bowl assumption (+70% over-estimation). In conclusion, the ability to make use of an automated beam plotting system, and a hydrophone with good spatial resolution, greatly facilitates characterisation of the FPF, and consequently gives improved confidence in estimating spatial peak intensity from measurement of acoustic power.

Citing Articles

Recent Advances and Future Directions in Sonodynamic Therapy for Cancer Treatment.

Datta P, Moolayadukkam S, Chowdhury D, Rayes A, Lee N, Sahu R BME Front. 2024; 2024:0080.

PMID: 39735354 PMC: 11671681. DOI: 10.34133/bmef.0080.


Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation for Stroke Recovery: A Novel Deep Brain Stimulation Approach for Neurorehabilitation?.

Yuksel M, Sun S, Latchoumane C, Bloch J, Courtine G, Raffin E IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2024; 4:300-318.

PMID: 38196977 PMC: 10776095. DOI: 10.1109/OJEMB.2023.3263690.


A systematic review of ultrasound-mediated drug delivery to the eye and critical insights to facilitate a timely path to the clinic.

Rad I, Chapman L, Tupally K, Veidt M, Al-Sadiq H, Sullivan R Theranostics. 2023; 13(11):3582-3638.

PMID: 37441595 PMC: 10334839. DOI: 10.7150/thno.82884.


Optical phase contrast imaging for absolute, quantitative measurements of ultrasonic fields with frequencies up to 20 MHz.

Goldfain A, Yung C, Briggman K, Hwang J J Acoust Soc Am. 2021; 149(6):4620.

PMID: 34241467 PMC: 9889099. DOI: 10.1121/10.0005431.


Feasibility and safety assessment of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU)-mediated mild hyperthermia in pelvic targets evaluated using an porcine model.

Zhu L, Partanen A, Talcott M, Gach H, Greco S, Henke L Int J Hyperthermia. 2019; 36(1):1147-1159.

PMID: 31752562 PMC: 7105895. DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2019.1685684.


References
1.
Huisman M, Lam M, Bartels L, Nijenhuis R, Moonen C, Knuttel F . Feasibility of volumetric MRI-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) for painful bone metastases. J Ther Ultrasound. 2014; 2:16. PMC: 4193684. DOI: 10.1186/2050-5736-2-16. View

2.
Shaw A . A buoyancy method for the measurement of total ultrasound power generated by HIFU transducers. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008; 34(8):1327-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.01.008. View

3.
Orsi F, Arnone P, Chen W, Zhang L . High intensity focused ultrasound ablation: a new therapeutic option for solid tumors. J Cancer Res Ther. 2011; 6(4):414-20. DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.77064. View

4.
Ishihara Y, Calderon A, Watanabe H, Okamoto K, Kuroda K, Suzuki Y . A precise and fast temperature mapping using water proton chemical shift. Magn Reson Med. 1995; 34(6):814-23. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910340606. View

5.
Pernot M, Aubry J, Tanter M, Boch A, Marquet F, Kujas M . In vivo transcranial brain surgery with an ultrasonic time reversal mirror. J Neurosurg. 2007; 106(6):1061-6. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2007.106.6.1061. View