» Articles » PMID: 29435899

Do Drains Contribute to Pancreatic Fistulae? Analysis of over 5000 Pancreatectomy Patients

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2018 Feb 14
PMID 29435899
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Conflicting evidence exists from randomized controlled trials supporting both increased complications/fistulae and improved outcomes with drain placement after pancreatectomy. The objective was to determine drain practice patterns in the USA, and to identify if drain placement was associated with fistula formation.

Methods: Demographic, perioperative, and patient outcome data were captured from the most recent annual NSQIP pancreatic demonstration project database, including components of the fistula risk score. Significant variables in univariate analysis were entered into adjusted logistic regression models.

Results: Of 5013 pancreatectomy patients, 4343 (87%) underwent drain placement and 18% of patients experienced a pancreatic fistula. When controlled for other factors, drain placement was associated with ducts < 3 mm, soft glands, and blood transfusion within 72 h of surgery. Age, obesity, neoadjuvant radiation, preoperative INR level, and malignant histology lost significance in the adjusted model. Drained patients experienced higher readmission rates (17 vs. 14%; p < 0.05) and increased (20 vs. 8%; p < 0.01) pancreatic fistulae. Fistula was associated with obesity, no neoadjuvant chemotherapy, drain placement, < 3 mm duct diameter, soft gland, and longer operative times. Drain placement remained independently associated with fistula after both distal pancreatectomy (OR = 2.84 (1.70, 4.75); p < 0.01) and pancreatoduodenectomy (OR = 2.29 (1.28, 4.11); p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Despite randomized controlled clinical trial data supporting no drain placement, drains are currently placed in the vast majority (87%) of pancreatectomy patients from > 100 institutions in the USA, particularly those with soft glands, small ducts, and perioperative blood transfusions. When these factors are controlled for, drain placement remains independently associated with fistulae after both distal and proximal pancreatectomy.

Citing Articles

Prophylactic abdominal drainage versus no-drainage after left pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xia N, Wang L, Huang X, Wang Z, Xiong J, Tian B Gland Surg. 2024; 13(11):2043-2054.

PMID: 39678416 PMC: 11635558. DOI: 10.21037/gs-24-351.


Drain Placement After Pancreatic Resection: Friend or Foe For Surgical Site Infections?.

Pollini T, Wong P, Kone L, El Khoury R, Kabir C, Maker V J Gastrointest Surg. 2023; 27(4):724-729.

PMID: 36737592 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05612-0.


Prevention and Treatment of Grade C Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula.

Xiang C, Chen Y, Liu X, Zheng Z, Zhang H, Tan C J Clin Med. 2022; 11(24).

PMID: 36556131 PMC: 9784648. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11247516.


Routine abdominal drainage after distal pancreatectomy: meta-analysis.

van Bodegraven E, van Ramshorst T, Balduzzi A, Abu Hilal M, Molenaar I, Salvia R Br J Surg. 2022; 109(6):486-488.

PMID: 35576374 PMC: 10364730. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac042.


Association of gravity drainage and complications following Whipple: an analysis of the ACS-NSQIP targeted database.

Hall B, Egr Z, Krell R, Padussis J, Shostrom V, Are C World J Surg Oncol. 2021; 19(1):118.

PMID: 33853623 PMC: 8048035. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02227-0.


References
1.
Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M . The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery. 2017; 161(3):584-591. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014. View

2.
Behrman S, Zarzaur B, Parmar A, Riall T, Hall B, Pitt H . Routine drainage of the operative bed following elective distal pancreatectomy does not reduce the occurrence of complications. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014; 19(1):72-9. PMC: 5543705. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-014-2608-z. View

3.
Witzigmann H, Diener M, Kienkotter S, Rossion I, Bruckner T, Barbel Werner . No Need for Routine Drainage After Pancreatic Head Resection: The Dual-Center, Randomized, Controlled PANDRA Trial (ISRCTN04937707). Ann Surg. 2016; 264(3):528-37. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001859. View

4.
Van Buren 2nd G, Bloomston M, Hughes S, Winter J, Behrman S, Zyromski N . A randomized prospective multicenter trial of pancreaticoduodenectomy with and without routine intraperitoneal drainage. Ann Surg. 2013; 259(4):605-12. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000460. View

5.
Lillemoe K, Cameron J, Kim M, Campbell K, Sauter P, Coleman J . Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004; 8(7):766-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.06.011. View