» Articles » PMID: 29428981

Factors Associated with Clinical and Radiological Status on Admission in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Abstract

Grading scales yield objective measure of the severity of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and serve as to guide treatment decisions and for prognostication. The purpose of this cohort study was to determine what factors govern a patient's disease-specific admission scores in a representative Central European cohort. The Swiss Study of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage includes anonymized data from all tertiary referral centers serving subarachnoid hemorrhage patients in Switzerland. The 2009-2014 dataset was used to evaluate the impact of patient and aneurysm characteristics on the patients' status at admission using descriptive and multivariate regression analysis. The primary/co-primary endpoints were the GCS and the WFNS grade. The secondary endpoints were the Fisher grade, the presence of a thick cisternal or ventricular clot, the presence of a new focal neurological deficit or cranial nerve palsy, and the patient's intubation status. In our cohort of 1787 consecutive patients, increasing patient age by 10 years and low pre-ictal functional status (mRS 3-5) were inversely correlated with "high" GCS score (GCS ≥ 13) (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.97 and OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.31-1.46), "low" WFNS grade (grade VI-V) (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.04-1.20 and OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.66-3.27), and high Fisher grade (grade III-IV) (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.00-1.17 and OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.55-4.32). Other independent predictors for the patients' clinical and radiological condition at admission were the ruptured aneurysms' location and its size. In sum, chronological age and pre-ictal functional status, as well as the ruptured aneurysm's location and size, determine the patients' clinical and radiological condition at admission to the tertiary referral hospital.

Citing Articles

A nomogram for predicting the necessity of tracheostomy after severe acute brain injury in patients within the neurosurgery intensive care unit: A retrospective cohort study.

Gao L, Chang Y, Lu S, Liu X, Yao X, Zhang W Heliyon. 2024; 10(6):e27416.

PMID: 38509924 PMC: 10951500. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27416.


Explainable machine learning in outcome prediction of high-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Shu L, Yan H, Wu Y, Yan T, Yang L, Zhang S Aging (Albany NY). 2024; 16(5):4654-4669.

PMID: 38431285 PMC: 10968679. DOI: 10.18632/aging.205621.


Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping in the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage in the elderly: a multicenter cohort study.

Lee K, Siow I, Yang L, Foo A, Zhang J, Mathews I Neurosurg Rev. 2024; 47(1):100.

PMID: 38427140 PMC: 10907408. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-02325-z.


Monitoring of Perioperative Microcirculation Dysfunction by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy for Neurological Deterioration and Prognosis of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: An Observational, Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Yang S, Tan B, Lin J, Wang X, Fu C, Wang K Neurol Ther. 2024; 13(2):475-495.

PMID: 38367176 PMC: 10951157. DOI: 10.1007/s40120-024-00585-x.


A novel visual dynamic nomogram to online predict the risk of unfavorable outcome in elderly aSAH patients after endovascular coiling: A retrospective study.

Lu W, Tong Y, Zhang C, Xiang L, Xiang L, Chen C Front Neurosci. 2023; 16:1037895.

PMID: 36704009 PMC: 9871773. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1037895.


References
1.
Vlak M, Rinkel G, Greebe P, Greving J, Algra A . Lifetime risks for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: multivariable risk stratification. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013; 84(6):619-23. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-303783. View

2.
Boogaarts H, Duarte Conde M, Janssen E, van Nuenen W, de Vries J, Donders R . The value of the Charlson Co-morbidity Index in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014; 156(9):1663-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-014-2160-3. View

3.
Lagares A, Gomez P, Lobato R, Alen J, Alday R, Campollo J . Prognostic factors on hospital admission after spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2001; 143(7):665-72. DOI: 10.1007/s007010170044. View

4.
Demirgil B, Tugcu B, Postalci L, Guclu G, Dalgic A, Oral Z . Factors leading to hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2004; 46(6):344-8. DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-812500. View

5.
Lagares A, de Toledo P, Fernandez-Alen J, Ibanez J, Arikan F, Sarabia R . [Spontaneous Subarachnoid Haemorrhage multicenter database from the Group for the Study of Vascular Pathology of the Spanish Society for Neurosurgery: presentation, inclusion criteria and development of an internet-based registry]. Neurocirugia (Astur). 2008; 19(5):405-15. View