» Articles » PMID: 29427312

Evaluation of Surface and Shallow Depth Dose Reductions Using a Superflab Bolus During Conventional and Advanced External Beam Radiotherapy

Overview
Date 2018 Feb 11
PMID 29427312
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a methodology to reduce scatter and leakage radiations to patients' surface and shallow depths during conventional and advanced external beam radiotherapy. Superflab boluses of different thicknesses were placed on top of a stack of solid water phantoms, and the bolus effect on surface and shallow depth doses for both open and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) beams was evaluated using thermoluminescent dosimeters and ion chamber measurements. Contralateral breast dose reduction caused by the bolus was evaluated by delivering clinical postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) plans to an anthropomorphic phantom. For the solid water phantom measurements, surface dose reduction caused by the Superflab bolus was achieved only in out-of-field area and on the incident side of the beam, and the dose reduction increased with bolus thickness. The dose reduction caused by the bolus was more significant at closer distances from the beam. Most of the dose reductions occurred in the first 2-cm depth and stopped at 4-cm depth. For clinical PMRT treatment plans, surface dose reductions using a 1-cm Superflab bolus were up to 31% and 62% for volumetric-modulated arc therapy and 4-field IMRT, respectively, but there was no dose reduction for Tomotherapy. A Superflab bolus can be used to reduce surface and shallow depth doses during external beam radiotherapy when it is placed out of the beam and on the incident side of the beam. Although we only validated this dose reduction strategy for PMRT treatments, it is applicable to any external beam radiotherapy and can potentially reduce patients' risk of developing radiation-induced side effects.

Citing Articles

Out of field scatter from electron applicator in modern linear accelerators.

Sengupta B, DeFillippo G, Sohn J, Yadav P, Das I J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024; 25(6):e14265.

PMID: 38335230 PMC: 11163494. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14265.


Skin Surface Dose for Whole Breast Radiotherapy Using Personalized Breast Holder: Comparison with Various Radiotherapy Techniques and Clinical Experiences.

Chen C, Lin C, Kuo C, Chen T, Lin S, Tseng K Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(13).

PMID: 35804977 PMC: 9264904. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133205.


A clinical trial to compare a 3D-printed bolus with a conventional bolus with the aim of reducing cardiopulmonary exposure in postmastectomy patients with volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Zhang Y, Huang Y, Ding S, Liang J, Kuang J, Mao Q Cancer Med. 2021; 11(4):1037-1047.

PMID: 34939343 PMC: 8855922. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4496.


Tomotherapy as an Alternative Irradiative Treatment for Complicated Keloids.

Lin Y, Shueng P, Roan T, Chang D, Yu Y, Chang C J Clin Med. 2020; 9(11).

PMID: 33233784 PMC: 7699841. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9113732.


Workload implications for clinic workflow with implementation of three-dimensional printed customized bolus for radiation therapy: A pilot study.

Ehler E, Sterling D, Dusenbery K, Lawrence J PLoS One. 2018; 13(10):e0204944.

PMID: 30273403 PMC: 6166970. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204944.

References
1.
Mullenders L, Atkinson M, Paretzke H, Sabatier L, Bouffler S . Assessing cancer risks of low-dose radiation. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009; 9(8):596-604. DOI: 10.1038/nrc2677. View

2.
Dorr W, Herrmann T . Cancer induction by radiotherapy: dose dependence and spatial relationship to irradiated volume. J Radiol Prot. 2002; 22(3A):A117-21. DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/22/3a/321. View

3.
KIRBY T, Hanson W, Johnston D . Uncertainty analysis of absorbed dose calculations from thermoluminescence dosimeters. Med Phys. 1992; 19(6):1427-33. DOI: 10.1118/1.596797. View

4.
Prado K, Nelson S, Nuyttens J, Williams T, Vanek K . Clinical implementation of the AAPM Task Group 36 recommendations on fetal dose from radiotherapy with photon beams: a head and neck irradiation case report. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2001; 1(1):1-7. PMC: 5726163. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v1i1.2650. View

5.
Brenner D, Sachs R . Estimating radiation-induced cancer risks at very low doses: rationale for using a linear no-threshold approach. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2006; 44(4):253-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00411-006-0029-4. View