Measuring Health-related Quality of Life in Patients with Advanced Cancer: a Systematic Review of Self-administered Measurement Instruments
Overview
Rehabilitation Medicine
Affiliations
Purpose: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are becoming increasingly important in clinical practice. The implementation of PROMS in routine practice is challenging because information regarding psychometric quality of measurement instruments is fragmented and standardization is lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of self-administered HRQoL measurement instruments for use in patients with advanced cancer in clinical practice.
Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL to identify studies concerning self-administered HRQoL measurement instruments in patients with advanced cancer between January 1990 and September 2016. Quality of the measurement instruments was assessed by predefined criteria derived from the COSMIN checklist.
Results: Sixty-nine articles relating to 39 measurement instruments met the inclusion criteria. Information regarding important measurement properties was often incomplete. None of the instruments performed sufficient on all measurement properties. Considering available information, the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL appeared to have adequate psychometric properties, together with the EORTC QLQ-BM22.
Conclusions: Many of the existing HRQoL measurement instruments have not yet been evaluated in an adequate manner. Validation of self-administered HRQoL measurement instruments is an ongoing development and should be prioritized. This review contributes to improved clarity regarding the availability and quality of HRQoL measurement instruments for patients with advanced cancer and supports health care professionals in an adequate selection of suitable PROMs in clinical practice.
Geeraerts J, Pivodic L, Rosquin L, Naert E, Crombez G, De Ridder M JMIR Cancer. 2024; 10:e57510.
PMID: 39499557 PMC: 11576598. DOI: 10.2196/57510.
Quality of Life in Palliative Care: A Systematic Meta-Review of Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Demuro M, Bratzu E, Lorrai S, Preti A Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2024; 20(Suppl-1):e17450179183857.
PMID: 39132583 PMC: 11311734. DOI: 10.2174/0117450179183857240226094258.
Intensive Longitudinal Methods Among Adults With Breast or Lung Cancer: Scoping Review.
Geeraerts J, de Nooijer K, Pivodic L, De Ridder M, Van den Block L J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e50224.
PMID: 38865186 PMC: 11208836. DOI: 10.2196/50224.
Bulamu N, Chen G, McGrane E, Cock C, Young G, Symonds E Cancer Causes Control. 2023; 35(2):347-357.
PMID: 37747615 PMC: 10787680. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01789-6.
Rose G, Stewart E, Clifford B, Bailey T, Rush A, Abbott C Support Care Cancer. 2023; 31(6):342.
PMID: 37195433 PMC: 10191940. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07790-8.