» Articles » PMID: 29423138

Developmental Constraint Through Negative Pleiotropy in the Zygomatic Arch

Overview
Journal Evodevo
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2018 Feb 10
PMID 29423138
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Previous analysis suggested that the relative contribution of individual bones to regional skull lengths differ between inbred mouse strains. If the negative correlation of adjacent bone lengths is associated with genetic variation in a heterogeneous population, it would be an example of negative pleiotropy, which occurs when a genetic factor leads to opposite effects in two phenotypes. Confirming negative pleiotropy and determining its basis may reveal important information about the maintenance of overall skull integration and developmental constraint on skull morphology.

Results: We identified negative correlations between the lengths of the frontal and parietal bones in the midline cranial vault as well as the zygomatic bone and zygomatic process of the maxilla, which contribute to the zygomatic arch. Through gene association mapping of a large heterogeneous population of Diversity Outbred (DO) mice, we identified a quantitative trait locus on chromosome 17 driving the antagonistic contribution of these two zygomatic arch bones to total zygomatic arch length. Candidate genes in this region were identified and real-time PCR of the maxillary processes of DO founder strain embryos indicated differences in the RNA expression levels for two of the candidate genes, and .

Conclusions: A genomic region underlying negative pleiotropy of two zygomatic arch bones was identified, which provides a mechanism for antagonism in component bone lengths while constraining overall zygomatic arch length. This type of mechanism may have led to variation in the contribution of individual bones to the zygomatic arch noted across mammals. Given that similar genetic and developmental mechanisms may underlie negative correlations in other parts of the skull, these results provide an important step toward understanding the developmental basis of evolutionary variation and constraint in skull morphology.

Citing Articles

Variable Craniofacial Shape and Development among Multiple Cave-Adapted Populations of .

Holtz N, Albertson R Integr Org Biol. 2024; 6(1):obae030.

PMID: 39234027 PMC: 11372417. DOI: 10.1093/iob/obae030.


Flexible conservatism in the skull modularity of convergently evolved myrmecophagous placental mammals.

Ferreira-Cardoso S, Claude J, Goswami A, Delsuc F, Hautier L BMC Ecol Evol. 2022; 22(1):87.

PMID: 35773630 PMC: 9248141. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-022-02030-9.


The genetic basis of neurocranial size and shape across varied lab mouse populations.

Percival C, Devine J, Hassan C, Vidal-Garcia M, OConnor-Coates C, Zaffarini E J Anat. 2022; 241(2):211-229.

PMID: 35357006 PMC: 9296060. DOI: 10.1111/joa.13657.


Facial shape and allometry quantitative trait locus intervals in the Diversity Outbred mouse are enriched for known skeletal and facial development genes.

Katz D, Aponte J, Liu W, Green R, Mayeux J, Pollard K PLoS One. 2020; 15(6):e0233377.

PMID: 32502155 PMC: 7274373. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233377.


Integration and the Developmental Genetics of Allometry.

Hallgrimsson B, Katz D, Aponte J, Larson J, Devine J, Gonzalez P Integr Comp Biol. 2019; 59(5):1369-1381.

PMID: 31199435 PMC: 6934422. DOI: 10.1093/icb/icz105.


References
1.
Holmes G, Basilico C . Mesodermal expression of Fgfr2S252W is necessary and sufficient to induce craniosynostosis in a mouse model of Apert syndrome. Dev Biol. 2012; 368(2):283-93. PMC: 3671595. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.05.026. View

2.
Bartholdi D, Asadollahi R, Oneda B, Schmitt-Mechelke T, Tonella P, Baumer A . Further delineation of genotype-phenotype correlation in homozygous 2p21 deletion syndromes: first description of patients without cystinuria. Am J Med Genet A. 2013; 161A(8):1853-9. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35994. View

3.
Hu D, Marcucio R . A SHH-responsive signaling center in the forebrain regulates craniofacial morphogenesis via the facial ectoderm. Development. 2008; 136(1):107-16. PMC: 2685963. DOI: 10.1242/dev.026583. View

4.
Burgio G, Baylac M, Heyer E, Montagutelli X . Genetic analysis of skull shape variation and morphological integration in the mouse using interspecific recombinant congenic strains between C57BL/6 and mice of the mus spretus species. Evolution. 2009; 63(10):2668-86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00737.x. View

5.
Franks E, Holton N, Scott J, McAbee K, Rink J, Pax K . Betwixt and Between: Intracranial Perspective on Zygomatic Arch Plasticity and Function in Mammals. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2016; 299(12):1646-1660. DOI: 10.1002/ar.23477. View