» Articles » PMID: 29416116

Machine Learning of Correlated Dihedral Potentials for Atomistic Molecular Force Fields

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2018 Feb 9
PMID 29416116
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Computer simulation increasingly complements experimental efforts to describe nanoscale structure formation. Molecular mechanics simulations and related computational methods fundamentally rely on the accuracy of classical atomistic force fields for the evaluation of inter- and intramolecular energies. One indispensable component of such force fields, in particular for large organic molecules, is the accuracy of molecule-specific dihedral potentials which are the key determinants of molecular flexibility. We show in this work that non-local correlations of dihedral potentials play a decisive role in the description of the total molecular energy-an effect which is neglected in most state-of-the-art dihedral force fields. We furthermore present an efficient machine learning approach to compute intramolecular conformational energies. We demonstrate with the example of α-NPD, a molecule frequently used in organic electronics, that this approach outperforms traditional force fields by decreasing the mean absolute deviations by one order of magnitude to values smaller than 0.37 kcal/mol (16.0 meV) per dihedral angle.

Citing Articles

Development and Validation of the Quantum Mechanical Bespoke Protein Force Field.

Allen A, Robertson M, Payne M, Cole D ACS Omega. 2019; 4(11):14537-14550.

PMID: 31528808 PMC: 6740169. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b01769.

References
1.
Mesta M, Carvelli M, de Vries R, van Eersel H, van der Holst J, Schober M . Molecular-scale simulation of electroluminescence in a multilayer white organic light-emitting diode. Nat Mater. 2013; 12(7):652-8. DOI: 10.1038/nmat3622. View

2.
Oostenbrink C, Villa A, Mark A, van Gunsteren W . A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6. J Comput Chem. 2004; 25(13):1656-76. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20090. View

3.
Koziara K, Stroet M, Malde A, Mark A . Testing and validation of the Automated Topology Builder (ATB) version 2.0: prediction of hydration free enthalpies. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2014; 28(3):221-33. DOI: 10.1007/s10822-014-9713-7. View

4.
Jorgensen W, Tirado-Rives J . The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J Am Chem Soc. 2016; 110(6):1657-66. DOI: 10.1021/ja00214a001. View

5.
Schmid N, Eichenberger A, Choutko A, Riniker S, Winger M, Mark A . Definition and testing of the GROMOS force-field versions 54A7 and 54B7. Eur Biophys J. 2011; 40(7):843-56. DOI: 10.1007/s00249-011-0700-9. View