» Articles » PMID: 29406437

Combining Eastern and Western Practices for Safe and Effective Endoscopic Resection of Large Complex Colorectal Lesions

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2018 Feb 7
PMID 29406437
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps is well established. However, significant differences in technique exist between eastern and western interventional endoscopists. We report the results of endoscopic resection of large complex colorectal lesions from a specialist unit that combines eastern and western techniques for assessment and resection.

Patients And Methods: Endoscopic resections of colorectal lesions of at least 2 cm were included. Lesions were assessed using magnification chromoendoscopy supplemented by colonoscopic ultrasound in selected cases. A lesion-specific approach to resection with endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was used. Surveillance endoscopy was performed at 3 (SC1) and 12 (SC2) months.

Results: Four hundred and sixty-six large (≥20 mm) colorectal lesions (mean size 54.8 mm) were resected. Three hundread and fifty-six were resected using endoscopic mucosal resection and 110 by ESD or hybrid ESD. Fifty-one percent of lesions had been subjected to previous failed attempts at resection or heavy manipulation (≥6 biopsies). Nevertheless, endoscopic resection was deemed successful after an initial attempt in 98%. Recurrence occurred in 15% and could be treated with endoscopic resection in most. Only two patients required surgery for perforation. Nine patients had postprocedure bleeding; only two required endoscopic clips. Ninety-six percent of patients without invasive cancer were free from recurrence and had avoided surgery at last follow-up.

Conclusion: Combining eastern and western practices for assessment and resection results in safe and effective organ-conserving treatment of complex colorectal lesions. Accurate assessment before and after resection using magnification chromoendoscopy and a lesion-specific approach to resection, incorporating ESD where appropriate, are important factors in achieving these results.

Citing Articles

High burden of polyp mischaracterisation in tertiary centre referrals for endoscopic resection may be alleviated by telestration.

Thrumurthy S, Htet H, Denesh D, Kandiah K, Mohammed N, Gulati S Frontline Gastroenterol. 2022; 14(1):32-37.

PMID: 36561787 PMC: 9763650. DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102161.


Is underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of colon polyps superior to conventional techniques? A network analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection and submucosal dissection.

Tan D, Ng C, Lim X, Lim W, Yuen L, Koh J Endosc Int Open. 2022; 10(1):E154-E162.

PMID: 35047346 PMC: 8759939. DOI: 10.1055/a-1633-3230.


Endoscopic submucosal dissection endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps: A meta-analysis and meta-regression with single arm analysis.

Lim X, Nistala K, Ng C, Lin S, Tan D, Ho K World J Gastroenterol. 2021; 27(25):3925-3939.

PMID: 34321855 PMC: 8291020. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i25.3925.


Histopathological features for coexistent invasive cancer in large colorectal adenomatous polyps.

Emmanuel A, Haji A, Gulati S, Moorhead J, Papagrigoriadis S, Hayee B BJS Open. 2021; 5(3).

PMID: 34131706 PMC: 8205855. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa053.


Outcomes of endoscopic resection of large colorectal lesions subjected to prior failed resection or substantial manipulation.

Emmanuel A, Gulati S, Burt M, Hayee B, Haji A Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019; 34(6):1033-1041.

PMID: 30944999 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-019-03285-3.